Cheney-Halliburton Connection
December 16, 2007 8:49 PM Subscribe
What's a good way to verify Dick Cheney's financial interest in Halliburton or lack thereof?
Corpwatch claims the vice president still holds (as of 2005) over 400,000 Halliburton stock options. Cheney claims he no longer has any financial interest in the company. I'm looking for a credible way to determine who's right.
Corpwatch claims the vice president still holds (as of 2005) over 400,000 Halliburton stock options. Cheney claims he no longer has any financial interest in the company. I'm looking for a credible way to determine who's right.
FactCheck (the right-wing version of Media Matters) claims to have the document the Cheneys signed that assigns the profits from the sale of the options ot charity. (The PDF is no longer online, though -- this was a 2004 Kerry ad rebuttal.)
posted by dhartung at 9:11 PM on December 16, 2007
posted by dhartung at 9:11 PM on December 16, 2007
Does he have enough money to buy the stock he has options to?
posted by smackfu at 9:20 PM on December 16, 2007
posted by smackfu at 9:20 PM on December 16, 2007
smackfu: that's hardly relevant. As long as the options are in the money, and someone has the cash to exercise them, they're almost cash.
That is a pretty complicated question, and a valid one.
It's not complicated at all, if one approaches the issue with anything like intellectual honesty. If you're holding an asset that will appreciate or depreciate directly in line with the ordinary stock of a company, of course you have a financial interest.
posted by pompomtom at 9:26 PM on December 16, 2007
That is a pretty complicated question, and a valid one.
It's not complicated at all, if one approaches the issue with anything like intellectual honesty. If you're holding an asset that will appreciate or depreciate directly in line with the ordinary stock of a company, of course you have a financial interest.
posted by pompomtom at 9:26 PM on December 16, 2007
Best answer: Some fairly detailed information about Cheney's 2006 finances, including $6.6 million of unnamed options that were given to charity in 2006.
posted by ikkyu2 at 9:27 PM on December 16, 2007
posted by ikkyu2 at 9:27 PM on December 16, 2007
As long as the options are in the money, and someone has the cash to exercise them, they're almost cash.
True. I was thinking the question was whether he had a controlling interest in the company, which options would not count as unless exercised and held.
posted by smackfu at 9:32 PM on December 16, 2007
True. I was thinking the question was whether he had a controlling interest in the company, which options would not count as unless exercised and held.
posted by smackfu at 9:32 PM on December 16, 2007
Response by poster: Thanks, all. Ikkyu2's link had more or less what I was after, although his link was from whitehouse.gov and I asked for credible sources. (ha)
posted by king walnut at 10:20 PM on December 16, 2007
posted by king walnut at 10:20 PM on December 16, 2007
Apparently Cheney has arranged to have his stock options given to charity so they are of little concern. Of more concern is the fact that he was getting checks for $200,000 in deferred compensation each year from Halliburton while sitting in the White House that went right into his pocket. Now, technically he can claim that this is money that was earned before be became vice-president, but could you imagine the howling if, say Gore, had been collecting $200,000 checks while the Clinton administration was awarding no-bid contracts to his former employer. In addition, Cheney, who worked for Halliburton for five years, was handed a $20 million bonus as a going away present when he resigned to run for vice-president, an investment that has paid off handsomely.
posted by JackFlash at 12:34 AM on December 17, 2007
posted by JackFlash at 12:34 AM on December 17, 2007
Mod note: few comments removed, do NOT turn this into a dem/rep thread, go to metatalk or email for that
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 3:47 AM on December 17, 2007
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 3:47 AM on December 17, 2007
On ikkyu2's point, it's worth noting that Cheney and his accountants took advantage of the temporary lifiting of the cap on charitable deductions following Hurricane Katrina to exercise a shitload of options. None of those donations went to Katrina-related charities: not legally inappropriate, but a 'creative' use of legislation sold on the back of hurricane relief.
posted by holgate at 3:58 AM on December 17, 2007
posted by holgate at 3:58 AM on December 17, 2007
This thread is closed to new comments.
Keep in mind, these are options, not shares. There was still not insignificant risk. If Halliburton had tanked, the shares would be underwater, just like anyone else in the same situation.
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 9:00 PM on December 16, 2007