I have severe dry eye symptoms and light sensitivities. I saw an ophthalmologist this morning who is a cornea specialist. He gave me some drops to use, but he also wants me to try taking
100 MG of doxycycline twice daily for six weeks to see if it helps increase tear and oil production in my eyes (I may be a little bit off but that's the gist of what I gathered).
My wifey believes antibiotics should be used as a distant last resort, and is very skeptical of me using a broad-spectrum antibiotic for that long.
Is the wifey overreacting?
Should I give the pills a try?
Also, is 100 MG of doxycycline a sub-anti-microbal dose?
Have you had positive or negative experiences using doxycycline for eye surface repair?
Thanks in advance, hive mind.
What is the basis of your wife's belief that antibiotics should be a last resort? I absolutely agree that antibiotics shouldn't be prescribed needlessly. Over-prescription of antibiotics contributes to the rise resistant bacteria, which are a major public health problem. So, when a child has the flu virus, there's no reason to give them antibiotics, no matter how much a parent may demand them.
This is a very different situation, though. You're not interested in the antibiotic effects of the drug - you're interested in the fact that it inhibits certain proteins on the surface of your own cells. This is a very legitimate reason to take the drugs, and to deprive yourself of potentially helpful treatment would be foolish. The potential gain to your own health is much greater than any small detrimental effects on society that you may have.
posted by chrisamiller at 5:40 PM on December 15, 2006