A successful PhD: software recommendations and other tips?
October 8, 2011 5:55 AM Subscribe
Hacks for a Successful PhD? I'm looking for tips or software that will help me - as a new PhD student - finish successfully. Researchers: tell me your tricks!
Three days ago, I started a PhD in the humanities. It's a three-year research-based PhD (i.e. no time spent on course-based Master's work, no TAing, etc. - it's research right away). I'm obviously invested in doing a good job and am of course prepared to do the bulk of the heavy lifting on my own. However I'm curious to know any tips from those already in the trenches. I'd be interested in more general advice and strategy, as well as particular software that might make my life easier. Essentially, I'll be reading secondary sources this year (primarily books, not articles), doing archival research next year, and writing up my findings in my final year (that's the plan anyway!).
I've heard Papers for Mekentosj recommended, although looking at it, it seems it might be more helpful for those in the sciences and/or those working primarily with PDF articles rather than books. I've also heard Endnote recommended, as well as Latex/Bibtex (?), but don't know much about how good they are. I've been warned that writing up a PhD is "almost impossible" in Microsoft Word, although I have no way to assess whether or not this is true. I've always done things totally old school and low-tech, working in Word. Certainly, when I was writing my master's dissertation, I would have welcomed some software to help organize and check my footnotes, but I don't know if what's out there is suitable for my subject, or more trouble than it's worth. Basically, I'd love to hear any advice you all have, especially regarding software, that you wish you'd known about at the beginning of your PhD. And if it's applicable to my humanities subject, even better!
posted by UniversityNomad to education (22 answers total) 33 users marked this as a favorite
Scrivener! A million times, Scrivener. It's for writing, moreso than organization (though it can be used for that). I think it takes some users a little while to get into it, but once you figure out your own workflow with it, it will become indispensable.
I use Endnote, but now it is more out of a sense of obligation than anything else: I paid for it, and by gum, I'm going to use it. It does the job but I have a lot of problems with it, not the least of which is that they release a new version almost every year and want users to pay full price to upgrade for what are ultimately pretty minor changes. Your best bet is to try a few of the bibliographical management programs out and see what works best for you, which may be just whichever one feels the least frustrating to use. Try Papers, Endnote, Sente, Zotero, and some others. Much of it really comes down to personal preference.
Instead of Word, I use Nisus Writer Pro, and love it. It is much easier, much more stable than Word on a Mac, and handled my dissertation quite well when I wanted to compile it all into one file. Word will probably do okay with individual chapters unless you start to try to do things like create tables of contents and such. The real trouble is, though, is that much of the world still uses Word and will look at you oddly for using anything else. Nisus Writer can open .doc's, but uses .rtf by default. If you need to send something to a Word user, you can just rename the file "whatever.doc" and they shouldn't flinch when they open it. The new version of Nisus Writer will also do comments and track changes, as well. You may want to give it a try.
posted by synecdoche at 6:21 AM on October 8, 2011 [1 favorite]