Hypertension
February 23, 2005 12:58 PM
Subscribe
For those with it, what's your experience with hypertension?
I've not seen a doctor yet, but rest assured I will very shortly. So this isn't intended to be any sort of substitute for getting adequate medical care.
Only a few weeks ago did it occur to me to start checking my blood pressure. I had gone to the ER a few times for things like kidney stones and, unsurprisingly, my BP was high then. The medical professionals and I attribtued it to the incredible pain I was experiencing. But, anyway, as I said, it occured to me a few weeks ago to start checking it under normal conditions to see if it is elevated. My dad, for past health reasons of his, has an automated one. And, the thing, it's really high. Over the course of a week, my blood pressure averaged (and didn't deviate much from) about 155 systolic, 115 diastolic. Occasionally both being upwards of those by about 10mmHg.
Doing a lot of web research, the diastolic seems to put me easily in "stage two" hypertension, where stage one and stage two seem to be the "official" designations. Some sources go further with stages three and four, in those my diastolic seems to place me in "stage three". So this seems awfully high. Is it really? Comparatively? I've also been told in the past, or read or something, that it is the diastolic that's the more important measurement. Is this true?
I did see a rheumotoligst last week for pain management and check-up of my skeletal condition (and we've brought out the big guns of opiates); the nurse there who took my BP said that mine was high enough to cause symptoms like headaches (which I do get a lot) and other things, but not high enough to cause the really bad symptoms. Of course, that's skipping over the question of whether I'm likely to drop dead any minute.
So, your experiences and knowledge?
posted by Ethereal Bligh to health & fitness (23 comments total)
posted by Woolcott'sKindredGal at 1:10 PM on February 23, 2005