A question for (straight) women about varieties of casual eye contact with semi-strange men
March 31, 2009 5:30 PM
Subscribe
A question, especially for straight women, about varieties of casual eye contact with semi-strange men:
At campus, a large workplace or other site with lots of people you see fairly often, most of whom you don't end up acquainting with, to what extent do subtle (or less subtle) differences in how men make passing eye contact affect your impression of them?
I'm not necessarily even talking about overt flirting here, but rather of being at all approachable in the first place, particularly to women who might understandably be wary of drawing attention from men who they don't know but are going to have to see every day, even if they, upon first hint of a smile, turn out to be awkward creeps (disclaimer: I've at least been one).
I do, occasionally, make such unspoken friendly connections with strange women, and then it's a lot more fun and easy to actually flirt and chat up than it is without, even when there otherwise is obvious mutual physical attraction. However, I have hardly a clue of why this happens at times, and doesn't at others. I want to know a) if it really is a matter of variations in eye contact (what else could it be?) and b) if it is, what exactly are the details that make the difference!
Thanks a bunch, I know you'll make my day :)
posted by anonymous to human relations (26 comments total)
11 users marked this as a favorite
Apparently, when women look at men there is no correlation in how long they look them in the eye and how attracted they are to them. On the other hand, you can find out a lot about how long the man looks at the woman in the eyes. If the guy looks the woman in the eyes for over 8.2 seconds he's probably smitten.
posted by zephyr_words at 5:40 PM on March 31