Ultrasonic contact lens cleaning?
November 17, 2007 6:24 PM Subscribe
Ultrasonic cleaning for disposable contact lenses: good idea or not?
This goes for about $15 (plus shipping).
This goes for about $15 (plus shipping).
Looks reasonable to me. Ultrasound is quite safe, and will help dislodge tiny particles that might not come off in normal washing.
posted by TeatimeGrommit at 6:29 PM on November 17, 2007
posted by TeatimeGrommit at 6:29 PM on November 17, 2007
Response by poster: I'll go for it and report back. Thanks for the answers.
posted by acro at 6:33 PM on November 17, 2007
posted by acro at 6:33 PM on November 17, 2007
meh, for the few cleanings you should give them prior to disposal won't your fingers suffice? Ultrasonics are good for things you can't reach like crevices. A big flat lens surface - who needs it, unless you are too lazy to put it between your fingers for a good rub.
posted by caddis at 7:19 PM on November 17, 2007
posted by caddis at 7:19 PM on November 17, 2007
The disposable contact lenses are exactly the same as doctors used to prescribe a single pair for wearing every day for a year -- maybe slightly thinner. There's no reason not to clean them thoroughly and continue wearing them.
posted by kindall at 11:47 AM on November 19, 2007
posted by kindall at 11:47 AM on November 19, 2007
Response by poster: Two month update... I've had a LensoClean for about two months now, and... underwhelmed. The extra handling that the lenses get going into and out of the basket holder, combined with the unhygienic recommendation by the manufacturer not to wash the device are weak points IMO. The results achieved reflect the lack of power of the device (~8W) versus higher powered light industrial devices.
posted by acro at 10:45 AM on January 25, 2008
posted by acro at 10:45 AM on January 25, 2008
« Older Do his speeding tickets still count against him... | Stylish shoes that won't make my painful corn... Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by kindall at 6:27 PM on November 17, 2007