If we know what we're talking about, can we review books without a PhD?
May 27, 2008 8:24 PM
Subscribe
Will academic journals generally publish book reviews written by people who are not academics, but who have applicable experience and knowledge?
I am interested in determining whether some journals might publish book reviews by people who, while not academics, nonetheless have knowledge and experience with a certain subject area. Possible collaborators would have masters' or professional degrees. Can we just contact individual journals to see if they'd be willing to share a list of books for review/find out their policy on the credentials of reviewers, or would that be a waste of time?
Of course we would only focus on specific publications and/or subject areas (in the social sciences) where we have knowledge and experience through our own work experience. It's not like we'd be trying anything or everything that comes along.
posted by midatlanticwanderer to media & arts (6 comments total)
3 users marked this as a favorite
The big hitch here is not the credential exactly, but whether you know the historiography. If you aren't familiar with what's gone before and where the new book fits within the scholarly history of the field, it's a tripping block. So if that isn't a strong suit you might want to spend some time reading around the topic and asking a good reference librarian for some help. The downside to this is that time spent doing your own research cuts deeply into any income you had hoped to make from reviews. If you're doing it to build your CV or profile or just for personal satisfaction, though, that doesn't matter.
posted by Miko at 8:41 PM on May 27, 2008