Lookin' for a new external that will satisfy
November 4, 2007 2:22 PM
Subscribe
Leopard / Time Machine / External Drive Filter: Looking for a new 2.5" external. How big should it be if my internal is 120 gigs? Firewire or USB?
My initial thinking is that USB is more common, I can plug it into PC's if I care to make an NTFS partition, and I've seen drives that allow you to daisy chain other USB things through the drive. But being relatively new to Macs, are there things Macs can do with Firewire(400?) that they can't do with USB?
posted by dino terror to computers & internet (22 comments total)
3 users marked this as a favorite
On paper, USB2 (480mbps) is faster than Firewire (400mpbs). In practice, for hard drives, you'll see better performance out of Firewire. But a 2.5" external's probably going to be USB2 rather than firewire - I haven't actually seen any FW drives that small. Also, pretty much all FireWire drives these days are both FW and USB2, so you can get the better speed on your Mac without sacrificing the ability to plug it into a PC. On the other hand, as you noted, that'll require making a non-HFS+ partition.
Also, if you want easy portability between Mac and Windows, you'll want to make that partition FAT32 rather than NTFS; NTFS has not-so-great usually-read-only support from non-Windows operating systems, while FAT32, for all its failings, is definitely the lingua franca of the filesystem world - Macs, Windows machines, and Linux can all deal with it effortlessly.
posted by Tomorrowful at 2:45 PM on November 4, 2007