Legalities regarding publishing other people's email
October 17, 2007 3:36 PM Subscribe
I'm considering writing a book based on email correspondence I've received. Can I use the emails in their entirety, provided I remove the names and addresses? What are the legal issues regarding this?
I'd like it known my number one concern is not exposing anyone's identity and embarrassing them. Thanks in advance.
I'd like it known my number one concern is not exposing anyone's identity and embarrassing them. Thanks in advance.
Well, the authors of the correspondence still own the copyright for publication, so you'd have to get their OK.
posted by klangklangston at 3:46 PM on October 17, 2007
posted by klangklangston at 3:46 PM on October 17, 2007
Yep, the copyright belongs to the author(s) of the email(s) and it is essentially irrelevant whether or not you conceal his/her/their identity.
posted by londongeezer at 4:04 PM on October 17, 2007
posted by londongeezer at 4:04 PM on October 17, 2007
Blogger Steve Graham wrote a book called "The Good, The Spam, and the Ugly" which reproduces various email exchanges he has had with 419 scammers.
In principle they could sue him, but to do that they'd have to identify themselves. They won't, because they'd be confessing to committing a crime. So Graham could get away with it.
Graham did not include the true identity of his correspndents, becaus of course he doesn't know.
Don Novello wrote a book called "The Lazlo Letters". He created a fictional character who was rather literal and clueless who wrote to various corporations and to famous people. The book is a collection of his letters and the responses he got. Novello did identify those with whom he corresponded. So far as I know Novello was never sued. (There was a sequel.)
It's possible that Novello got a pass via the humor clause of the Fair Use exception. If so, that would cover Graham too.
I think that you need to consult a competent IP lawyer.
posted by Steven C. Den Beste at 4:52 PM on October 17, 2007
In principle they could sue him, but to do that they'd have to identify themselves. They won't, because they'd be confessing to committing a crime. So Graham could get away with it.
Graham did not include the true identity of his correspndents, becaus of course he doesn't know.
Don Novello wrote a book called "The Lazlo Letters". He created a fictional character who was rather literal and clueless who wrote to various corporations and to famous people. The book is a collection of his letters and the responses he got. Novello did identify those with whom he corresponded. So far as I know Novello was never sued. (There was a sequel.)
It's possible that Novello got a pass via the humor clause of the Fair Use exception. If so, that would cover Graham too.
I think that you need to consult a competent IP lawyer.
posted by Steven C. Den Beste at 4:52 PM on October 17, 2007
Not only Lazlo Letters but Letters From a Nut (same premise) went through several sequels... I'm sure no permission was obtained and the company names were retained intact.
posted by rolypolyman at 5:16 PM on October 17, 2007
posted by rolypolyman at 5:16 PM on October 17, 2007
Response by poster: Great answers. I'm much clearer on the matter. Thank you to everyone.
posted by PoopyDoop at 5:49 PM on October 17, 2007
posted by PoopyDoop at 5:49 PM on October 17, 2007
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by GaelFC at 3:45 PM on October 17, 2007