A couple of iTunes/iPod questions ~or~ How do I make my 2 computers and 2 iPods love each other?
October 15, 2007 7:40 PM Subscribe
A couple of iTunes/iPod questions ~or~ How do I make my 2 computers and 2 iPods love each other?
I have had a 4GB 1st gen iPod Nano for 2 years. I juggled music on and off of it from my library on my home computer, and brought it to work where I listened to said music, plus podcasts. I could download said podcasts at work, and have them with me, listen to them on runs, etc etc. I have been loving the size, the shape, the Nike+, the disk mode, all while daydreaming of having all my music with me, tons of space for files, and a little video. Yesterday, I got the 160GB. Things are more complicated now.
Two questions, hopefully not quickly answered with three ugly letters (D..R..M..):
1. With my new Classic in Sync mode, I can't play music off of it in iTunes at work (everything's greyed out), and with it in Manual mode, it doesn't automatically sync. Am I forced to add every track I add to my home library to my iPod manually? WWWWHHHHHYYY???
2. If I download a podcast at work, can I listen to half of it, bring it home, and then sync my Classic with my library, and then add the podcast (with where i left off intact) to the Nano to listen to when I run? I "understand" the copyright paranoia, but since all of these devices are "authorized" by my iTunes account, I should be able to do this, right? RIGHT??
I have had a 4GB 1st gen iPod Nano for 2 years. I juggled music on and off of it from my library on my home computer, and brought it to work where I listened to said music, plus podcasts. I could download said podcasts at work, and have them with me, listen to them on runs, etc etc. I have been loving the size, the shape, the Nike+, the disk mode, all while daydreaming of having all my music with me, tons of space for files, and a little video. Yesterday, I got the 160GB. Things are more complicated now.
Two questions, hopefully not quickly answered with three ugly letters (D..R..M..):
1. With my new Classic in Sync mode, I can't play music off of it in iTunes at work (everything's greyed out), and with it in Manual mode, it doesn't automatically sync. Am I forced to add every track I add to my home library to my iPod manually? WWWWHHHHHYYY???
2. If I download a podcast at work, can I listen to half of it, bring it home, and then sync my Classic with my library, and then add the podcast (with where i left off intact) to the Nano to listen to when I run? I "understand" the copyright paranoia, but since all of these devices are "authorized" by my iTunes account, I should be able to do this, right? RIGHT??
1) In sync mode, you can't play music off of the iPod. You have to have the iPod hooked up in Manual mode in order to browse its music library and play it while docked to the computer. (I think what you want to do is probably keep the iPod synched with the computer at home, but manually associated with the computer at work. Then you can listen to its contents using your work machine. I think you can do that.)
2) No. If you add content when the iPod is synched to one computer, then sync it to a different computer that doesn't have the content already, the new content will be erased from the iPod. It will not be copied "up" from the iPod to the computer.*
Basically, the iPod is not designed to be synched to multiple computers. It works best when you only sync it to one computer, and then use it manually with any other computers that you might attach it to. Since it is intentionallybroken designed to disallow true bidirectional synchronization, you will run into issues trying to use it to keep two computers in sync. (Basically, you are not supposed to use an iPod to keep two computers in sync. Which sucks.)
This is probably the most glaring, totally artificial limitation of the iPod/iTunes combo, and I think you can lay it squarely at the feet of the copyright lobby and Apple's pandering to them.
* Possible exception: I think new versions of iTunes will copy purchased DRMed music from the iTunes Music store from your iPod to a computer during a sync operation ... but this is the ONLY iPod-to-computer movement (of tracks; metadata moves freely) that iTunes allows. Normal tracks, including Podcasts, can only go in one direction, and that's from the computer to the iPod. To go the other way, you need special tools.
posted by Kadin2048 at 7:59 PM on October 15, 2007
2) No. If you add content when the iPod is synched to one computer, then sync it to a different computer that doesn't have the content already, the new content will be erased from the iPod. It will not be copied "up" from the iPod to the computer.*
Basically, the iPod is not designed to be synched to multiple computers. It works best when you only sync it to one computer, and then use it manually with any other computers that you might attach it to. Since it is intentionally
This is probably the most glaring, totally artificial limitation of the iPod/iTunes combo, and I think you can lay it squarely at the feet of the copyright lobby and Apple's pandering to them.
* Possible exception: I think new versions of iTunes will copy purchased DRMed music from the iTunes Music store from your iPod to a computer during a sync operation ... but this is the ONLY iPod-to-computer movement (of tracks; metadata moves freely) that iTunes allows. Normal tracks, including Podcasts, can only go in one direction, and that's from the computer to the iPod. To go the other way, you need special tools.
posted by Kadin2048 at 7:59 PM on October 15, 2007
You can install Rockbox or iPodLinux on the iPod Nano, and use something other than iTunes on the computer, and then you won't be subjected to this kind of demeaning copyright-nanny "fair use who?" software restrictions. There are many benefits and a few downsides to replacing your iPod's firmware, as the two options' wikis will explain. Afaik, the new iPod Classic hasn't been broken into yet, but that will probably change soon if it hasn't already.
Next time you want a new player, I hope you will express your dissatisfaction with Apple for creating these barriers by buying a cheaper better player from someone else.
The iPod hasn't been the best portable music player for years now, and most of the competing devices allow you to read and write the music using Finder or any other program (except iTunes, which of course does not let you put music on removable devices other than iPods).
A question for you: When you purchased the iPod Classic, were you unaware of the restrictions around the iTunes library syncing? Or, did you just assume you'd need to figure out how to circumvent it somehow?
posted by finite at 1:18 AM on October 16, 2007
Next time you want a new player, I hope you will express your dissatisfaction with Apple for creating these barriers by buying a cheaper better player from someone else.
The iPod hasn't been the best portable music player for years now, and most of the competing devices allow you to read and write the music using Finder or any other program (except iTunes, which of course does not let you put music on removable devices other than iPods).
A question for you: When you purchased the iPod Classic, were you unaware of the restrictions around the iTunes library syncing? Or, did you just assume you'd need to figure out how to circumvent it somehow?
posted by finite at 1:18 AM on October 16, 2007
Since the latest iTunes sw clearly HAS code to sync files bidirectionally (after filtering "files" down to "iTunes Store-purchased files"), can a hack to remove that filter be on the horizon?
Just saying.
posted by rokusan at 2:59 AM on October 16, 2007
Just saying.
posted by rokusan at 2:59 AM on October 16, 2007
To add a plank to my own rickety bridge... since even DRM-free songs from the iTunes store work this new bidirectional way, do you suppose the iTunes software just checks for the "store-bought" meta-information when deciding whether or not to sync a given file?
If so, um... even easier opportunity for someone with a smidge more time than I have this week. Whoever reads this and gets so-inspired, drop me an e-mail via my profile, pls.
posted by rokusan at 5:38 AM on October 16, 2007
If so, um... even easier opportunity for someone with a smidge more time than I have this week. Whoever reads this and gets so-inspired, drop me an e-mail via my profile, pls.
posted by rokusan at 5:38 AM on October 16, 2007
(except iTunes, which of course does not let you put music on removable devices other than iPods).
That's not true.
1. With my new Classic in Sync mode, I can't play music off of it in iTunes at work (everything's greyed out), and with it in Manual mode, it doesn't automatically sync. Am I forced to add every track I add to my home library to my iPod manually? WWWWHHHHHYYY???
You shouldn't have to add them all manually -- just right-click on the iPod and choose Sync. It'll update your iPod with new songs.
posted by bonaldi at 6:19 AM on October 16, 2007
That's not true.
1. With my new Classic in Sync mode, I can't play music off of it in iTunes at work (everything's greyed out), and with it in Manual mode, it doesn't automatically sync. Am I forced to add every track I add to my home library to my iPod manually? WWWWHHHHHYYY???
You shouldn't have to add them all manually -- just right-click on the iPod and choose Sync. It'll update your iPod with new songs.
posted by bonaldi at 6:19 AM on October 16, 2007
Response by poster: Thanks.
bonaldi, I'll test this when I get home. It's odd that it would still sync if it's in Manual mode, but I noticed it still says it's syncing when you plug it in.
I guess i'll have to use my own workarounds for the podcast issue, I was hoping there was a way to do it "officially." rokusan makes a good point though.
posted by bradn at 8:39 AM on October 16, 2007
bonaldi, I'll test this when I get home. It's odd that it would still sync if it's in Manual mode, but I noticed it still says it's syncing when you plug it in.
I guess i'll have to use my own workarounds for the podcast issue, I was hoping there was a way to do it "officially." rokusan makes a good point though.
posted by bradn at 8:39 AM on October 16, 2007
@bonaldi "That's not true."
Are you sure? I haven't used iTunes in a while, but googling for non-iPod iTunes just now indicated that it still cannot access other players without resorting to unsupported hacks or 3rd party software.
do you suppose the iTunes software just checks for the "store-bought" meta-information when deciding whether or not to sync a given file?
Probably, yes. But doesn't it also check if the computer doing the syncing is the one allowed to? And even if you were to "fix" (break) this mechanism to your liking, if you publicize it don't you think Apple will just "break" (fix) it again in an update?
Can't you see that Apple's interests and your interests are no longer compatible? (I switched to Linux about a year ago, after a more than a decade of using, supporting, and recommending Macs, and it is working out very well here.)
posted by finite at 12:17 PM on October 16, 2007
Are you sure? I haven't used iTunes in a while, but googling for non-iPod iTunes just now indicated that it still cannot access other players without resorting to unsupported hacks or 3rd party software.
do you suppose the iTunes software just checks for the "store-bought" meta-information when deciding whether or not to sync a given file?
Probably, yes. But doesn't it also check if the computer doing the syncing is the one allowed to? And even if you were to "fix" (break) this mechanism to your liking, if you publicize it don't you think Apple will just "break" (fix) it again in an update?
Can't you see that Apple's interests and your interests are no longer compatible? (I switched to Linux about a year ago, after a more than a decade of using, supporting, and recommending Macs, and it is working out very well here.)
posted by finite at 12:17 PM on October 16, 2007
finite: yep -- and I don't think this list is exhaustive, either.
I agree that Apple's interests are no longer ours, tho.
posted by bonaldi at 1:33 PM on October 16, 2007
I agree that Apple's interests are no longer ours, tho.
posted by bonaldi at 1:33 PM on October 16, 2007
I stand corrected about iTunes being unable to access any non-Apple devices. It can apparently now access a handful of models made by Creative, SonicBlue, and Nike, and one by Nakamichi.
But, from the looks of that list, it still can't access most of the portable players out there, or any of the ones I'd recommend buying (iriver, Archos, SanDisk, lots of others). Which is strange, because almost all of them use the same totally standard USB Mass Storage protocol. If iTunes still can't put music on a generic USB thumb drive, then it still isn't compatible with most models of music player.
(The iPod also functions as a USB Mass Storage drive, eg the way it shows up in Finder, but songs copied to it that way cannot be played by the iPod's firmware.)
posted by finite at 7:46 PM on October 16, 2007
But, from the looks of that list, it still can't access most of the portable players out there, or any of the ones I'd recommend buying (iriver, Archos, SanDisk, lots of others). Which is strange, because almost all of them use the same totally standard USB Mass Storage protocol. If iTunes still can't put music on a generic USB thumb drive, then it still isn't compatible with most models of music player.
(The iPod also functions as a USB Mass Storage drive, eg the way it shows up in Finder, but songs copied to it that way cannot be played by the iPod's firmware.)
posted by finite at 7:46 PM on October 16, 2007
To answer the question in the original post: WWWWHHHHHYYY???
This is all apparently because Apple is worried, far more than competing hardware manufacturers seem to be, about offending the copyright industry somehow.
posted by finite at 7:47 PM on October 16, 2007
This is all apparently because Apple is worried, far more than competing hardware manufacturers seem to be, about offending the copyright industry somehow.
posted by finite at 7:47 PM on October 16, 2007
Because almost all of them use the same totally standard USB Mass Storage protocol.
It does those ones the file way -- you drag the songs or playlists to the finder's icon for the drive and they copy over.
far more than competing hardware manufacturers seem to be
I'd say Microsoft is still worse here, tho that's damning with no praise at all.
posted by bonaldi at 8:17 PM on October 16, 2007
It does those ones the file way -- you drag the songs or playlists to the finder's icon for the drive and they copy over.
far more than competing hardware manufacturers seem to be
I'd say Microsoft is still worse here, tho that's damning with no praise at all.
posted by bonaldi at 8:17 PM on October 16, 2007
Response by poster: Uh, bonaldi... I plugged my "manually managed" iPod into my home computer last night, right clicked on the iPod in the Source pane and selected "sync". I left it overnight and this morning ejected it, only to find that ALL my music and movies were gone from the iPod. It's awfully quiet at work today.
posted by bradn at 6:46 AM on October 17, 2007
posted by bradn at 6:46 AM on October 17, 2007
Holy shit, how did that happen? That makes no sense at all.
Seriously, I'm did this myself for about a year. My iPod was manually managed so that I could play it through my girlfriend's PC, but when I got home and chose sync, it copied my library over to it with any changes.
Sorry for your quiet day!
posted by bonaldi at 7:05 AM on October 17, 2007
Seriously, I'm did this myself for about a year. My iPod was manually managed so that I could play it through my girlfriend's PC, but when I got home and chose sync, it copied my library over to it with any changes.
Sorry for your quiet day!
posted by bonaldi at 7:05 AM on October 17, 2007
Response by poster: Yeah, it seems really odd to me too. To be truthful, I suspected it had crashed last night (the arrows on the iPod weren't moving), but I just left it alone and went to bed anyway. This morning, it said syncing was complete, but when I ejected it, it started syncing again, the same as last night. I didnt' have time to wait so I pulled the plug before it said to. It seems strange that it would be wiped, even if an error occured at that point. Guess I still have some tinkering to do. I thought these things were supposed to be easy.
posted by bradn at 7:32 AM on October 17, 2007
posted by bradn at 7:32 AM on October 17, 2007
Response by poster: And I didn't mean to blame you for the quiet day, I appreciate your help. There is plenty to listen to online.
posted by bradn at 7:33 AM on October 17, 2007
posted by bradn at 7:33 AM on October 17, 2007
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by cjorgensen at 7:53 PM on October 15, 2007