How can I make a good proposal for Instant Run-off voting? And would Bush have won in 1992 under IRO?
August 2, 2004 9:50 AM Subscribe
I have a meeting upcoming with some of my legislators, on various levels, and I want to be able to make a good 5-minute proposal for Instant Run-off voting. Not that I expect to outright win them over, but hopefully hit a few points up front to make them sit up and pay attention, and maybe plant a few "hmmm" thoughts.
As a more specific sub-question on the same topic, I'd like to make the argument that, since 2004 is too soon for any change, and we cannot tell the future, it would be a non-partisan change. I think it's agreed that Gore would have won in 2000 under Instant Run-off voting. Am I correct in my belief that under IRO, Bush would have won re-election in 1992?
implicit in the first question, is, of course, a "can anyone help?"
As a more specific sub-question on the same topic, I'd like to make the argument that, since 2004 is too soon for any change, and we cannot tell the future, it would be a non-partisan change. I think it's agreed that Gore would have won in 2000 under Instant Run-off voting. Am I correct in my belief that under IRO, Bush would have won re-election in 1992?
implicit in the first question, is, of course, a "can anyone help?"
This thread is closed to new comments.
The 2000 VNS exit poll (note: given the unpleasantness surrounding that election, VNS data is to be viewed critically) asks the question of who the voter would have chosen in a two-way race. If you reverse-crosstab the poll, you find that 46% of Nader voters would have voted for Gore, 24% would have voted for Bush, and 30% would have not voted. Those are national numbers. CNN.com can split exit poll results for you by state.
posted by PrinceValium at 2:17 PM on August 2, 2004