When did professional speech-ghostwriting start, and how confident can I be that those who delivered "classic" speeches and letters actually wrote them themselves?
I was heartily impressed by
Sherman's letter to Atlanta, as linked in
this Metafilter thread, and was thinking about it when it occurred to me that I assume that all speeches, letters, and discourse beyond a kind of fuzzy 1950-ish date were actually created by the person that delivered/sent it.
By contrast, I don't think anybody expects that even the most "inspirational" people in public life and politics actually write their own material these days; U.S. politicians certainly don't now, nor, I expect, do the leaders of corporations or huge social movements.
So how far back can I be confident that public figures actually did write their own speeches? Or did they ever?
I think the increased need for dedicated speechwriters rose with the increased number of required speeches. It used to be that someone campaigning for office, for example, could give the same speech dozens or hundreds of times. Now each of those occasions requires at least some original content, because each speech is available to the whole nation. So I'd expect that if you graphed the number of speechwriters and the prevalence of electronic media that you'd see a strong correlation between the two curves. I'd say it's impossible for someone regularly speaking on the national stage to get by without speechwriters anymore.
posted by winston at 8:47 AM on July 4, 2008