It actually began in Ireland in 1998, I think it is a publicity thing. Good for the race's profile and good for showcasing the country it is 'visiting'. posted by kenaman at 7:50 AM on July 22, 2004
The route changes every year, and often involves one or more nearby foreign countries, for the same reason the olympics are held in different countries every four: publicity. "This year's tour route announced; includes Malta" is just one more story the race organisers can get into the media. Changing the route also helps encourage spectatorship. posted by ChasFile at 7:59 AM on July 22, 2004
There was talk of a stage in Montreal once. I still think that would be cool, although the riders might not appreciate the jet lag. Follow-up question: Has the Tour always finished in Paris? posted by teg at 8:58 AM on July 22, 2004
Has the Tour always finished in Paris?
IANATdFHistorian, but I think so, yeah. It's traditional. The last day usually isn't that critical, the yellow jersey having been decided in the last mountain or time-trial stages. posted by bonehead at 9:09 AM on July 22, 2004
AFAIK the first stage is always outside France. It went through UK once, I watched it zing through Brighton. posted by carter at 10:14 AM on July 22, 2004
Quebec City will be celebrating its 400th anniversary on July 3, 2008 and has been trying to get the Tour to do a stage nearby as part of the summer celebrations. So far, I've heard that the organizers have said the plane rides will be too much of an interruption, but I gather Quebec continues to lobby for it.
It would be fun. There's some nice hilly terrain around the city. posted by zadcat at 10:59 AM on July 22, 2004
« Older
What are the big "youth&q...
| The GIF patent finally expired...
Newer »
posted by kenaman at 7:50 AM on July 22, 2004