It's Slinky, it's Slinky, it's fun for a girl and a boy.
March 27, 2008 1:21 PM
How fast would a typical escalator need to operate, in order to keep a standard metal Slinky moving indefinitely (i.e., in place)?
Here is a little more info that would seem relevant at first glance.
posted by JonnyRotten at 1:53 PM on March 27, 2008
posted by JonnyRotten at 1:53 PM on March 27, 2008
I don't think it would work, no matter what the speed. See here, about 35 seconds in.
posted by ND¢ at 2:14 PM on March 27, 2008
posted by ND¢ at 2:14 PM on March 27, 2008
Having tried this years ago - though I only got two tries before deciding it was best to make a getaway - I think the escalator treads are too wide.
Though maybe it would work in Wyoming.
posted by R. Mutt at 3:35 PM on March 28, 2008
Though maybe it would work in Wyoming.
posted by R. Mutt at 3:35 PM on March 28, 2008
A Slinky might go for longer on any old escalator than on a stationary staircase with the same step width. But I would expect the step-to-step "classic" Slinky motion to be unstable: you can see in ND¢'s video (if not in your head) that rolling down the steps like a tube is more stable, and that having both ends on the same plane is stabler still. Without some feedback, a Slinky falling end-to-end --- even on a moving staircase --- will eventually transition to one of these other modes. Transitions back seem quite unlikely.
posted by fantabulous timewaster at 7:30 AM on April 24, 2008
posted by fantabulous timewaster at 7:30 AM on April 24, 2008
« Older Why is my nose numb after the flu? | How/where do girls meet other girls (platonic) in... Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by JonnyRotten at 1:50 PM on March 27, 2008