SubscribeBut there's another recent use of need, about the same vintage as needs fixed, that we all find acceptable: The OED's first example, from 1911, is "Any dirty work you need done." That is, if the thing being fixed (washed, done) is the object rather than the subject of the verb, we like it just fine. She needs it done today.This raises an interesting point - that few people, if any, are are offended by "he needs the car washed," and yet it's hard to think of any meaningful difference (other than the subject-object switch) between that and the other horrible, awful, grating, annoying, weird, and "wrong" instances of dropped "to be" in this thread. Second, mentioned by the Globe is a brief discussion on Language Log, a blog populated by real-life linguists, which notes:
And yet, the same infinitive is omitted in both expressions:
He needs the car [to be] washed.
The car needs [to be] washed.
Why would the first become standard while the second remained a minority usage? Maybe because, with needs to be fixed and needs fixing already in circulation, there was little demand for the third variation, needs fixed.
The answers that linguists give are rarely fully satisfying to the questioners. Mostly, we explain the history of a variant, if we know it or can find it out, and we appeal to general mechanisms of change -- of sound change, syntactic change, semantic change, borrowing, lexical innovation, and so on. So we say that the construction in needs washed is just a continuation of a pattern in the speech of Scots-Irish settlers in the U.S. When pressed further, we explain that the construction makes syntactic sense: the subject of needs washed is understood as the object of the verb WASH, so the semantics here is a lot like the semantics of the passive, and we use the past participle form (washed) in the passive, so why not use it here?Much of the time, the answer depends on nothing more than chance.
At this point, our questioner is likely to say that that's all fine and good, but why did the Scots-Irish, and not other people, innovate this variant?
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
posted by bedhead at 9:14 AM on February 21