Sound Bites
May 10, 2004 6:49 AM Subscribe
When did the practice of TV news types speaking in—hmm, I guess they're headlines in a way—start? Lots of present participles, very few verbs. Was some kind of research done that showed people prefer to have someone tell them the news that way?
Not too sure about the origins of the way of speaking, but there was a great comedy series called The Day Today which aired about 10 years ago in the UK. It parodied TV news to a tee, and was bloody hilarious. You can all 6 episodes on DVD now, well worth a look.
Link
"Bouncing elephantiasis woman destroys central Portsmouth!
posted by derbs at 9:52 AM on May 10, 2004
Link
"Bouncing elephantiasis woman destroys central Portsmouth!
posted by derbs at 9:52 AM on May 10, 2004
Response by poster: Thanks for both responses.
pmurray63, yours could've even been worked into an FPP, I bet. Neat.
"Gerald Ford shot senselessly dead, at the age of 83."
posted by emelenjr at 12:43 PM on May 10, 2004
pmurray63, yours could've even been worked into an FPP, I bet. Neat.
"Gerald Ford shot senselessly dead, at the age of 83."
posted by emelenjr at 12:43 PM on May 10, 2004
NYT article [abstract]
Going in from a search on Google brings up the whole article - gotta login though (bugmenot).
posted by ao4047 at 2:55 PM on May 10, 2004
Going in from a search on Google brings up the whole article - gotta login though (bugmenot).
posted by ao4047 at 2:55 PM on May 10, 2004
Michael Kinsley wrote about this phenomenon a few years back. I seem to recall a subsequent analysis attributing the style to the need to convey a sense of immediacy and urgency to news stories.
posted by jjg at 4:39 PM on May 10, 2004
posted by jjg at 4:39 PM on May 10, 2004
Ah, here's one such analysis. And Geoffrey Nunberg apparently wrote on the topic for the New York Times once, but now you have to pay to read it.
posted by jjg at 4:45 PM on May 10, 2004
posted by jjg at 4:45 PM on May 10, 2004
I quoted a substantial chunk of Nunberg's piece in my LH entry on the topic, and there are some interesting comments as well.
posted by languagehat at 7:03 PM on May 10, 2004
posted by languagehat at 7:03 PM on May 10, 2004
This thread is closed to new comments.
It reminded me of a famous 1936 New Yorker profile of Henry Luce, written by Wolcott Gibbs. Early in its life, Time magazine adopted a vivid writing style, which they called Timespeak, that produced very odd sentences (they dropped this style many years ago). In Gibbs' profile of Luce, he parodied it with a breathless description of the magazine's origins, most famously "Backward ran sentences until reeled the mind" and ultimately ending with: "... Certainly to be taken with seriousness is Luce at thirty-eight, his fellowman already informed up to his ears, his future plans impossible to contemplate. Where it all will end, knows God!" (More details)
posted by pmurray63 at 8:31 AM on May 10, 2004