I've used Microsoft bCentral.com SharePoint sites for project collaboration with clients for the past few years.
Now that Microsoft no longer allows for new bCentral/SharePoint sites, they are pushing
Microsoft Office Live as the replacement. I've set up a trial account, and am poking around to make sure I can do everything in Live that bCentral did. The primary functionality that I utilize the most on the bCentral SharePoint sites is contact info, issues tracking, user accounts, alerts, and document sharing, behind a password protected login.
It appears, for the most part, that the same functionality is available under Live. However, the part that bothers me to the point of abandoning the MS solution is that if I add user accounts to the site to utilize these tools, they have to have a Microsoft Live ID in order to access the site and utilize the tools. I don't want to force my clients to create a Live ID (which is an MSN Passport account requiring personal information) just to use the site. bCentral didn't require this.
The more I tinker with MS Office Live, the more I despise it. That said, I think I need to look at other options.
Would like to hear from MeFites with experience with other paid, hosted, project collaboration sites. I've taken a cursory glance at basecamp. Although it looks promising, I need to sell my colleagues on whatever solution I decide on, and I fear that they will be concerned that it is not hosted by a "big name" company (think MS, IBM, etc). I work for a medium-sized but well-known company, so there is a concern that our tools should not be too obscure. Internally we utilize the Microsoft SharePoint technology (for intranet/team sites) quite successfully, although I am not bound to stick with MS for client-facing projects.
So, to reiterate, I need experiential feedback for hosted proven, secure, robust project collaboration sites.
Failing that, I've used Basecamp and really quite like it.
posted by dirtynumbangelboy at 3:58 PM on January 30, 2007