I live in Berkeley, CA and have a great job offer in...yeesh...Palo Alto, so a commute is in my future. I need help in reducing that commute as much as possible. Some ideas:
* If I get a hybrid, are those carpool lane stickers still available? It will help on time and money.
* What GPS units will realistically help my commute based on traffic conditions?
* What else can you think of?
More details in the extended explanation...
I have a new job offer and am doing some calculations. Since my wife and I only have one car (I used to walk to and from BART), a new car will have to be purchased for my Berkeley to Palo Alto commute.
For the car, I have settled on a small car, late model (I want as much repair-free longevity as possible). I like the Prius because it is a hybrid (lower carbon footprint) and is a 4D hatchback. Given all my other factors, it is a little more expensive, but not by too much given the tax credit and possible savings on tolls. The other reason I want it is to save on commute time by using the carpool lanes (I would hit two on my I-880 to 92 to I-280 regular route). I have seen that the CA legislature has added more carpool lane stickers. Have they run out on those yet? If they have, one impetus has been removed to buy the hybrid, as I would not save time and I would also be paying about $84 in tolls/month.
I have also decided on a new Prius instead of a used, as the used ones seem to be fetching higher than new MSRP. My understanding was that there was no waiting list for the 2007 Prius at this time. Am I wrong?
If you don't think a hybrid is worth it, what is? I like the 4D hatchback form factor, but I haven't found one that is both economical (in fuel and cost) and reliable long term. Most of my research is from Consumer Reports and Edmunds, but they offer no easy way of searching on those criteria. I prefer buying used, but late model (2005 on up). I have excluded the super mini cars due to safety concerns.
GPS: I want to save money by not getting the built-in factory GPS (about $2000 on its own! This includes all the Toyotas and Hondas I was looking at) and get one with traffic conditions built in. This way, if my main route is super clogged, I want something that will relatively accurately calculate the shortest route time-wise. I already have a Palm Treo 650 so I was going to try out TomTom Nav 6 (only $150 for software--I already have a BT GPS). Does anyone have any other suggestions? Live traffic is my most important criterion. Cost is second.
Does anyone else have any suggestions for reducing my commute time? I am already working out if I can change my work hours to off-commute, but that is not guaranteed. Work from home is out at this point, too.
Thanks in advance, internet my friend.
I commute daily from San Francisco to Menlo Park; I have colleagues who drive from East Bay (Oakland, Berk,) to here. I take 101 S to 380 E to 280 S; my EBay colleagues take the Bay Bridge, and then follow my route. Water-cooler conversations have revealed that the Ebayers dislike the 880/92 etc. route because traffic seems to be worse. While crossing the Bay Bridge at morning rush hour (going west) is no fun, the rest of the drive is basically in reverse commute direction. On the rare occasion when I've taken 101 south to Palo Alto in order to get to work, the traffic makes me want to cry. And 280 is way prettier.
As far as I know, there are still hybrid/carpool lane stickers available. I drive a 2001 Prius, and don't cross any bridges or drive on roads with carpool lanes, so the stickers aren't doing me any good, but I have them. At 7:30 am, commute time from the 101S/280 split takes about 30 minutes. I'm getting about 48 mpg.
posted by rtha at 2:40 PM on January 17, 2007