cheap omega-3 from fish filter
June 12, 2006 12:22 AM
Subscribe
I've decided that I'd like to get more omega-3 fatty acids from fish in my diet, and I'm wondering what the most cost effective way to get it is.
(The omega-3 from plant sources such as walnuts and flax appears to be
different than the omega-3 from fish.) Judging from a quick google search, canned sardines and canned wild salmon are good sources of omega-3, and judging by a trip to my grocery store, canned pink salmon and sardines seem to be the best choices on a value basis. However, there seem to be quite a few links on the web saying that the double cooking of canned tuna used by large companies is bad, because of increased mercury and/or decreased omega-3.
Are canned sardines and canned wild salmon a good source of omega-3 (and in the case of salmon, a relatively low source of mercury)? If yes, how is the canning of sardines and salmon better than the canning of tuna?
posted by mrkohrea to food & drink (12 comments total)
2 users marked this as a favorite
Yes to the differences in flax/fish oil omega-3.
You can also get 'purified' caplets that have removed environmental toxins like mercury, PCB's, etc. Take those claims with a grain of salt, but it's better than tuna that definitely has not been purified.
Salmon is inherently lower in mercury and a good source of omega-3. I'm really unsure about the specifics of canning, though. Google seems to indicate that there's a healthy serving of omega-3 in canned salmon.
posted by empyrean at 1:09 AM on June 12, 2006