Alternate day fasting vs. caloric restriction?
November 8, 2013 8:12 AM Subscribe
Does anyone have information about the pros and cons (in terms of fat loss, metabolic effects, and anything else) of alternate-day or intermittent fasting vs. alternate-day or intermittent caloric restriction (e.g. in diets like the 5:2 diet or the UpDayDown diet where on your "fast" days you take in 20% of your normal calories)?
The research currently favors IF. This may be a good starting point.
I have had the same experience with water fasting as flabdablet.
posted by Tanizaki at 8:47 AM on November 8, 2013
I have had the same experience with water fasting as flabdablet.
posted by Tanizaki at 8:47 AM on November 8, 2013
I worked with two women who fasted on a 5:2. One of their husbands also fasted and had a similar experience as flabdablet and Tanizaki, except he continued to lose weight. He also cut down on beer. They cut out eating entirely (water fasting) as opposed to eating a little.
I fasted on Fridays for Lent a few years ago, and I found that not eating at all was much better than eating a little. I had the same experience as flabdablet. I'd eat a little and have an intense hunger.
posted by Ms. Moonlight at 9:15 AM on November 8, 2013
I fasted on Fridays for Lent a few years ago, and I found that not eating at all was much better than eating a little. I had the same experience as flabdablet. I'd eat a little and have an intense hunger.
posted by Ms. Moonlight at 9:15 AM on November 8, 2013
I'll join the chorus of water-fasting-is-much-easier. I'm following the Fast-5 plan.
posted by Johnny Wallflower at 10:53 AM on November 8, 2013 [1 favorite]
posted by Johnny Wallflower at 10:53 AM on November 8, 2013 [1 favorite]
This thread is closed to new comments.
Personally I find water-only fasting causes me a hell of a lot less suffering. My experience has always been that eating only a small amount of food triggers an intense grinding hunger that lasts for two to three hours; the hunger pangs I get from a full fast are easily damped down with a good swig of water and last ten minutes max.
As far as rate of weight loss goes: I've found that 5:2 (where the 2 are full fast days) was enough to drop from 157kg to 145kg over seven weeks, after which I observed no further loss for another seven. This is about as good a weight loss result as I've had from any other plan not involving Biggest Loser levels of punishment and misery.
posted by flabdablet at 8:45 AM on November 8, 2013 [1 favorite]