Need help figuring out the next step in my quest to get my deposit and pro-rated rent back from my landlord. Difficulty - I am now living out of state.
I gave 30 days notice to my landlord last December.
I was out of the home with the 30 day period, but the landlord and his agent postponed the walk-through three times. By the time they could come to the house, I was in another state. Luckily, my BF was able to meet with the agent to do the walk-through a week after I left (still w/i the 30 day period).
This was mid-January and I have yet to receive my deposits and my pro-rated rent from January (I paid the whole month, but left mid-month), for a grand total of $2300 and change.
I have sent two emails, with a detailed breakdown of the deposits, and a copy of the lease agreement. I have a letter ready to send out certified mail on Monday, with said details and a reminder of the
rental law in the State of California.
The time limit on when they need to inform me about any damages for which they might be withholding a portion of the deposit passed long ago.
So, what should I do next (assuming I get no response to the letter)?
Lawyer, mediation, arbitration? Small claims court?
My biggest worry is the fact that I am no longer living in California, and it would be difficult money- and time-wise to get time off if I needed to be present in California for any of the proffered solutions.
I hope this makes sense, feel free to ask for clarification on the timeline/details.
If it helps, I lived there for 4 years.
Thanks!
You seem pretty knowledgeable about the requirements regarding security deposits, so you are already a few steps ahead of most tenants. I do not practice in CA, but assuming it has anything like the model landlord/tenant act, your landlord would have had a short period e.g. 15 days to notify you of any intent to withhold a portion or all of the security deposit. Since that didn't happen, you are entitled to a return of the deposit. It doesn't mean he couldn't sue you for damage for the apartment if such damage exists. It just means that he can't apply the security deposit to it.
I cannot say whether or not he needs to prorate your rent because I haven't seen your lease and I don't know the landlord/tenant act of your state.
Some lawyers specialize in this sort of low stakes tenant's cases. I've dealt with a rather tenacious one myself. If I were you, I would find this lawyer and have him lined up to file suit. Despite the low amount at issue, I think you have a good chance of finding a reputable tenant's rights lawyer because they tend to have very efficient practices that make the work profitable for them. What is also in your favor is that failure to return a security deposit is very open and shut to prove, and you have papered your file well. Plus, landlord/tenant acts almost always have a attorney's fee provision and your lease probably has a prevailing party clause. I do not expect you to have much trouble finding a good lawyer in your area who is willing to do this on a contingency basis or for his statutory/contractual fee entitlement. You'll still have to pay court costs and may need to pay a retainer, but I think it is a good way to go. If you know any California lawyers or have friends who know California lawyers, see if they can get you a referral. Otherwise, use the California bar's lawyer referral service.
Once you have that lawyer lined up, I would send one final letter saying that if you do not receive payment by Date X, you are filing suit. Then, if you don't have payment by Date X, tell the lawyer to pull the trigger. The reason I recommend lining up the lawyer first is so that you can carry out your threat as soon as the landlord doesn't pay. If you have the lawyer, you will not need to physically be in California except to testify at trial or a deposition. I think it is unlikely that either a trial or any deposition will take place because there just isn't much to prove up in a case like this.
I am usually the last person to cheer "lawyer up!" but I think it is the appropriate move in this case for the reasons I have discussed.
posted by Tanizaki at 9:38 PM on March 2