Hi, I'm a programmer at a trading firm. People at Goldman Sachs have told me that my trading firm is considered very good at what it does. What I've learned from the traders at my firm is that they are very, very good at their jobs and they have several advantages which are not available to you. Briefly:posted by jessamyn at 6:59 AM on October 4, 2012 [3 favorites]
- Your strategies actually have to be more profitable than the professionals' because you will pay more to execute them. One example: Every exchange I know has a different fee schedule for individual investors than for market-makers and broker-dealers. Usually there are discounts or rebates or some other form of payment offered to MM/BDs for providing liquidity. Another: unless you have an operations/post-trade department you haven't mentioned, you'll need to go through a broker-dealer, who will nail you with fees that the professionals don't have to pay.
- Even if you execute only good trades (positive expectancy), you will lose money, and the professionals have a lot more to lose than you. You may say think, "Oh, but I won't execute big trades." Except lots of trades actually have unbounded risk. If you write a call on stock you don't own, and the counterparty exercises it, you're on the hook to deliver that stock at whatever it costs. You can do a one-dollar trade and be on the hook for a million dollars. This is a very obvious example; there are more subtle ones, and even professionals can't always tell the difference.
- The first few years of a trader's career is a matter of buying experience with money (through making mistakes), and that's a process where you're disadvantaged in two ways. First of all, because professionals just have more money than you. And second of all, because they get to cheat by learning from the mistakes already made by their colleagues. (This is not the same as reading some forum on the internet or studying someone's newsletter. If that guy knew what he was talking about, he'd go execute the trades himself.)
There are lots more, but I have to go to work now. The bottom line is, don't do it. Kadin2048 seems to know what he's talking about; listen to him. So does kovacs, but he's not as strongly discouraging so I'd rather you didn't read him.
FauxScot, I'm sorry to say, doesn't sound like he's offering you very informed advice. For one thing, MBAs don't learn anything about trading. For another, covered calls are a stock joke in trading: hugely popular with the retail crowd, but not actually a sensible idea at all. The founder of my firm has told sad, head-shaking stories about how he's had to dissuade his friends from buying into some quack's covered call strategy.
If you really want to do this, use your engineering program to take lots of statistics, and then go interview at a few good trading firm. If you can't get an offer, that's their way of saying, "We really want you go to on the market, but not with our money."
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
TD Ameritrade's ThinkTDA platform has some nice tools for options trading, though they do lean in a Black-Scholes / Gaussian direction.
posted by b1tr0t at 10:48 PM on October 3, 2012