Open enrollment deadlines and dilemmas
May 18, 2012 9:06 AM Subscribe
It's open enrollment time, and given the changes in all the policies, it's now a lot harder for a clear cut decision.
So my company offers 3 plans: a CDHP, PPO and EPO. (CDHP is not a high-deductible type plan)
I've always used the EPO since it's a premium + co-pays. IE everything is covered 100% after the co-pay. Even the flex-spend auto-reimburses me for all the co-pays. So there's very little paperwork/time I need to spend on it.
Only, now the premium has gone up considerably, the co-pays went up, and they dropped to 90% coverage (with a max-out-of-pocket 6k).
So I'm looking at the CDHP plan. Cost wise, it's ~15% of the EPO (1k vs 7k), has a HRA etc. It pays 80% after 1200 deductible is met, max out of pocket is 7.5k.
It'd be me (mis 30s) and 3 small kids. I can't carry the Mrs because work won't cover a spouse who has access to coverage through their employer.
So, why am I reluctant to move to the CDHP ? I think it's just fear that something "major bad" happens, and we get the shaft. The kids are almost all well-kid visits (viz the strep/whatever about twice a year - they are pretty healthy kids), and I don't get sick too often. The rational part of me says do the CDHP, but the desire to avoid risk is pushing me away, even at a higher cost.
Help convince me, please.
So my company offers 3 plans: a CDHP, PPO and EPO. (CDHP is not a high-deductible type plan)
I've always used the EPO since it's a premium + co-pays. IE everything is covered 100% after the co-pay. Even the flex-spend auto-reimburses me for all the co-pays. So there's very little paperwork/time I need to spend on it.
Only, now the premium has gone up considerably, the co-pays went up, and they dropped to 90% coverage (with a max-out-of-pocket 6k).
So I'm looking at the CDHP plan. Cost wise, it's ~15% of the EPO (1k vs 7k), has a HRA etc. It pays 80% after 1200 deductible is met, max out of pocket is 7.5k.
It'd be me (mis 30s) and 3 small kids. I can't carry the Mrs because work won't cover a spouse who has access to coverage through their employer.
So, why am I reluctant to move to the CDHP ? I think it's just fear that something "major bad" happens, and we get the shaft. The kids are almost all well-kid visits (viz the strep/whatever about twice a year - they are pretty healthy kids), and I don't get sick too often. The rational part of me says do the CDHP, but the desire to avoid risk is pushing me away, even at a higher cost.
Help convince me, please.
I don't know what EPOs and CDHPs are, so maybe I'm misunderstanding, but if the max out of pocket of the EPO is 6K and the max out of pocket of the CDHP is 7.5K it seems to me it might be worth switching over. It's hard to say without knowing every little detail, but if the difference in max out of pocket is only $1500 and the monthly premiums are much lower... does the EPO have a deductible? Add in what you're likely to spend in a year for copays and deductibles. It sounds like, since there's a cap on out of pocket on both, this is really just a math problem, not a gamble.
posted by rabbitrabbit at 10:10 AM on May 18, 2012
posted by rabbitrabbit at 10:10 AM on May 18, 2012
Break out the cost numbers, including what you will spend on premiums, at various levels for the different plans. What happens for $1,000 in medical costs + your premiums? $5,000? $10,000? $50,000 (not unrealistic for a hospital stay)?
That being said, it kind of sucks that the CDHP is NOT high-deductible, because if it were, then you could open an HSA, which has major tax bennies even if you don't make a lot of money. The fact that you can't do that makes it a less attractive option all around.
posted by Currer Belfry at 10:29 AM on May 18, 2012 [1 favorite]
That being said, it kind of sucks that the CDHP is NOT high-deductible, because if it were, then you could open an HSA, which has major tax bennies even if you don't make a lot of money. The fact that you can't do that makes it a less attractive option all around.
posted by Currer Belfry at 10:29 AM on May 18, 2012 [1 favorite]
This thread is closed to new comments.
To repeat myself from an answer I gave someone else in 2010, You are definitely not being financially foolish by choosing to be risk-averse when looking at insurance options. It's far, far, FAR more foolish to assume that just because you and your kids have had minimal health needs up until now that you don't need insurance that will protect you in case (or more likely, when) something more major occurs.
posted by iminurmefi at 9:20 AM on May 18, 2012