I run a micropress, and we've been designing paper books for a while. Now we want to make a jump to e-books. Our books are very heavy on illustration/images and light on text, so we thought (also after seeing that Chris Ware opted for an
iPad story) that we would skip the e-reader format all together at least for now and go directly to a tablet (interactivity and screen size being the main issues here).
I don't know much about tablets, but I can say that I find Apple's strict policies a pain and unfair. I know that I'd have to pay to develop an app and keep on paying, but I don't know if the iPad is the only tablet that's worth create something for right now. I'd rather try a format that's open, but I'd like to have readers too. Besides, I don't know which Android tablet would be a good one - suggestions?
Any ideas? Also, if
not adopting e-readers sounds like a bad idea, let me know why!
Thanks, mefites!
For all the griping about Apple charging their $99ses, iPad/iPhone developers are making bucketloads of money, and it's not like Android development is actually any more profitable by any measure.
Per last month's Piper Jaffray report summary: The Apple iApp Store has grossed $4.9 billion to date, $3.5 billion of which was paid back to developers. (that's 71%). Android Market has grossed $341 million and paid $239 million back to developers. (70%).
You will probably end up doing both eventually, but the iPad is where the money is, to the tune of fifteen times the volume. Small developers who work for both usually show the same sort of breakdown.
But you can and should certainly develop an iPad app that is 95% portable to Android, OSX, or anything else. The data is the data, and your product is 95% data, right?
posted by rokusan at 8:32 AM on December 9, 2011 [3 favorites]