How do I intelligently stretch my desktop wallpaper in Windows?
April 25, 2005 8:43 AM
Windows 2000/XP has three options for setting desktop wallpaper: Center, Tile, and Stretch. Unfortunately, these are all kinda dumb. If I want to set a photo from my digital camera as my wallpaper, I'm stuck with a bad fit (Center), repeating images (Tile), or an incorrect aspect ratio (Stretch). Is there any third-party utility that will intelligently resize my desktop wallpaper?
In other words, I want it to fill the screen without changing the aspect ratio. Any excess on the sides would just be cut off; either the very top/bottom or left/right, depending on its orientation. This seems like a simple hack, but I can't find any utility that does it.
In other words, I want it to fill the screen without changing the aspect ratio. Any excess on the sides would just be cut off; either the very top/bottom or left/right, depending on its orientation. This seems like a simple hack, but I can't find any utility that does it.
I don't know a program that does it, but the word for that would be a "bleed" (when the excess is cut off without a border).
posted by mdn at 8:52 AM on April 25, 2005
posted by mdn at 8:52 AM on April 25, 2005
You probably want the largest 4:3 aspect ratio possible. Photoshop and Gimp will allow you to set aspect ratio of the marquee tool (to 4:3 (or 16:9)) and then you can select the largesty possible fit.
Also, you might check out the BIMP, which should let you do the same sort of thing without as much of a giant graphics program.
posted by 31d1 at 8:53 AM on April 25, 2005
Also, you might check out the BIMP, which should let you do the same sort of thing without as much of a giant graphics program.
posted by 31d1 at 8:53 AM on April 25, 2005
Cropping the photos to 4:3 by hand is a pain I'd like to avoid. It means opening the file, cropping, saving a new copy, opening the copy, and setting the wallpaper. There are countless desktop wallpaper utilities out there for Windows; I was hoping at least one did this automatically.
Incidentally, the Mac handles this behavior appropriately by default.
posted by waxpancake at 9:00 AM on April 25, 2005
Incidentally, the Mac handles this behavior appropriately by default.
posted by waxpancake at 9:00 AM on April 25, 2005
I use dWall, although it works with folders of images rather than just one.
posted by smackfu at 9:49 AM on April 25, 2005
posted by smackfu at 9:49 AM on April 25, 2005
I reduce the picture to a bit more than 1024 x 768 pixels, copy it, then open a new Photoshop file to 1024 x 768, paste in the pic, move it around so it has good composition, and save as a bitmap. Whatever overlaps is gone. Not automatic, but pretty quick, and you get to compose.
posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 10:02 AM on April 25, 2005
posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 10:02 AM on April 25, 2005
I don't know if this is still the case, but for older versions of Windows I know that having a centred image on your desktop was in the top ten ways to slow down your OS....
posted by forallmankind at 10:02 AM on April 25, 2005
posted by forallmankind at 10:02 AM on April 25, 2005
I had a small image that I wanted to hover in the bottom-right corner. I used the ability of windows to have a web page as a background, and wrote a small .htm positioning the picture where I wanted. It worked perfectly, even when I repeated the process on my laptop/tabletPC and had the screen flip orientation whenever I flipped it around and latched it down over the keyboard.
There was one flaw, however...If explorer crashes and has to restart, you will have a minor headache for ~30 seconds setting the picture up again.
posted by mystyk at 10:44 AM on April 25, 2005
There was one flaw, however...If explorer crashes and has to restart, you will have a minor headache for ~30 seconds setting the picture up again.
posted by mystyk at 10:44 AM on April 25, 2005
I use webshots for my wallpaper as well as a slide show for my screen saver. Since I do not know how to make a hyper link, the address is webshots.com.
posted by yodelingisfun at 12:21 PM on April 25, 2005
posted by yodelingisfun at 12:21 PM on April 25, 2005
Cropping the photos to 4:3 by hand is a pain I'd like to avoid. It means opening the file, cropping, saving a new copy, opening the copy, and setting the wallpaper.
This is a 5 minute operation at worst. How often are you changing wallpapers that this is a problem?
posted by juv3nal at 1:37 PM on April 25, 2005
This is a 5 minute operation at worst. How often are you changing wallpapers that this is a problem?
posted by juv3nal at 1:37 PM on April 25, 2005
I really like Wallpaper Master. It can do other clever things, too.
posted by boo_radley at 1:47 PM on April 25, 2005
posted by boo_radley at 1:47 PM on April 25, 2005
I second wallpaper master. It has a 'stretch' setting that will enlarge without distortion and leave space. It's pretty sweet and it's FREE!
posted by Mach5 at 6:53 PM on April 25, 2005
posted by Mach5 at 6:53 PM on April 25, 2005
Even if I change wallpaper once a week, five minutes is an annoyance. Wallpaper Master reproduces Windows' crappy stretch function, leaving space around the image.
Apparently, there's no good solution for doing this. I should just write my own.
posted by waxpancake at 12:34 AM on April 26, 2005
Apparently, there's no good solution for doing this. I should just write my own.
posted by waxpancake at 12:34 AM on April 26, 2005
Be sure it's set to resize and check the settings for Auto-Stretch in Further Options. The space around the image might be larger than its setting.
posted by boo_radley at 5:49 AM on April 26, 2005
posted by boo_radley at 5:49 AM on April 26, 2005
« Older Book title: Scifi book about escaping from... | Cheap transportation from RDU airport to ECU... Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by Dipsomaniac at 8:46 AM on April 25, 2005