Is there something wrong with Malvino's Electronic Principles
June 9, 2010 10:37 PM Subscribe
Is there a reason Malvino's Electronic Principles would be considered a bad book?
A coworker told me that when he was in college in the 1980s, he was told to avoid Malvino's Electronic Principles because it was "full of errors" and "wrong". I've been going through an old edition (© 1973, 1979), and so far I haven't seen anything egregious; it seems to agree with other textbooks. But then there's this Amazon review, and the fact that I'm not an electronics expert.
Is it a poor pedagogical approach? The fact that Malvino uses ideal approximations when he shouldn't? Something else?
A coworker told me that when he was in college in the 1980s, he was told to avoid Malvino's Electronic Principles because it was "full of errors" and "wrong". I've been going through an old edition (© 1973, 1979), and so far I haven't seen anything egregious; it seems to agree with other textbooks. But then there's this Amazon review, and the fact that I'm not an electronics expert.
Is it a poor pedagogical approach? The fact that Malvino uses ideal approximations when he shouldn't? Something else?
I used Malvino's Digital Computer Electronics for a class and it was excellent. I bought Electronic Principles because I loved DCE so much. His style is a little more conversational, and I suppose that some people really dislike that.
posted by 200burritos at 12:06 AM on June 10, 2010
posted by 200burritos at 12:06 AM on June 10, 2010
« Older How much have we learned about petroleum geology... | Australia Travel TV...but different Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.
Hell, I understand there are even people who don't like A FORTRAN Coloring Book.
posted by flabdablet at 11:40 PM on June 9, 2010