Which forums do the best web programmers hang out at?
June 26, 2009 4:15 PM Subscribe
Which forums do the best web programmers hang out at?
Long story short: I've got a web site that already does over 1 million pageviews per month. I've got a great idea to take it to the next level, but I'm looking for someone who can handle the coding and technical aspects in exchange for an equity stake.
I'm wanting to bring aboard a great programmer who doesn't necessarily need the work but will be motivated by the equity.
Which forums would you recommend I post on to find this person?
Also, if there's anyone interested here, let me know.
Long story short: I've got a web site that already does over 1 million pageviews per month. I've got a great idea to take it to the next level, but I'm looking for someone who can handle the coding and technical aspects in exchange for an equity stake.
I'm wanting to bring aboard a great programmer who doesn't necessarily need the work but will be motivated by the equity.
Which forums would you recommend I post on to find this person?
Also, if there's anyone interested here, let me know.
in exchange for an equity stake.
Also be aware that this will serve as an enormous waving red flag to most experienced developers. Most of us prefer to be paid for our work.
Equity is only an incentive if one or more of the following is true:
a) the company has an established revenue stream;
b) it's the developer's dream project or s/he's otherwise emotionally tied to the project, which generally means s/he's a cofounder, not somebody you find on a message board;
c) it's in addition to a salary which would be reasonable on its own merits; or
d) it's ten years ago and the dotcom bubble is still going strong.
Seriously. Every developer who has been in the business longer than about six months has been approached by loads of dreamers with completely unmarketable ideas, hoping you'll work for them for free so they can give you some of the profits later on if they ever materialize.
This is not to say that you aren't sincere, just that by putting it like this you'll be making yourself appear to be in that category.
posted by ook at 5:02 PM on June 26, 2009 [4 favorites]
Also be aware that this will serve as an enormous waving red flag to most experienced developers. Most of us prefer to be paid for our work.
Equity is only an incentive if one or more of the following is true:
a) the company has an established revenue stream;
b) it's the developer's dream project or s/he's otherwise emotionally tied to the project, which generally means s/he's a cofounder, not somebody you find on a message board;
c) it's in addition to a salary which would be reasonable on its own merits; or
d) it's ten years ago and the dotcom bubble is still going strong.
Seriously. Every developer who has been in the business longer than about six months has been approached by loads of dreamers with completely unmarketable ideas, hoping you'll work for them for free so they can give you some of the profits later on if they ever materialize.
This is not to say that you aren't sincere, just that by putting it like this you'll be making yourself appear to be in that category.
posted by ook at 5:02 PM on June 26, 2009 [4 favorites]
The Dailly WTF, though it isn't what it once was. And yeah, don't give away equity for a programming job. Can you quantify the tasks that need performing?
b1tr0t++
posted by mattoxic at 5:34 AM on June 27, 2009
b1tr0t++
posted by mattoxic at 5:34 AM on June 27, 2009
I was going to ask almost the exact same question next week. ook++, and b1t0t++. I was under the assumption, as well, that one would have no trouble finding a stranger who would work for equity.
Are you sure that there aren't people out there who are would-be-entrepreneurs who are happy to work on other's people's ideas for equity? I mean, if I knew more about jackson5's idea, I'd maybe consider it. So long as he could afford to pay me enough for Ramen Noodles. (If such a market exists, someone should set up www.development-equity-exchange.com or similar).
Begs the question: how the hrist would someone in jackson5 (or my) situation raise enough money to pay a developer? I guess, you'd need to be well connected (and a good communicator) to get rich friends and family to invest. I guess, ideally, that you have a soul-mate who is also a good programmer to work on it in the first place.
posted by tomargue at 7:28 AM on June 27, 2009
anyone willing to take your equity stake is not a good person to have as a business partner.
Why is this the case? (not saying it's not, just wanna know your thoughts).
posted by tomargue at 7:34 AM on June 27, 2009
Begs the question: how the hrist would someone in jackson5 (or my) situation raise enough money to pay a developer? I guess, you'd need to be well connected (and a good communicator) to get rich friends and family to invest. I guess, ideally, that you have a soul-mate who is also a good programmer to work on it in the first place.
The basis of entrepreneurial b-school educations. The sources are endless. Bank loans, credit cards, friends and family, angel investment clubs, self-finance, bootstrapping (i.e. start small with something that pay for itself and allows you to grow). In almost all cases you need to come up with a business plan that details what you are going to do, how you are different than other people doing similiar things and how you are going to make money (and this better not be Google Adsense).
posted by mmascolino at 8:06 AM on June 27, 2009
The basis of entrepreneurial b-school educations. The sources are endless. Bank loans, credit cards, friends and family, angel investment clubs, self-finance, bootstrapping (i.e. start small with something that pay for itself and allows you to grow). In almost all cases you need to come up with a business plan that details what you are going to do, how you are different than other people doing similiar things and how you are going to make money (and this better not be Google Adsense).
posted by mmascolino at 8:06 AM on June 27, 2009
You can't find anyone willing to give you cash money to fund your business idea, yet you think you can find someone willing to put in hard work, when they could be working on their own ideas or relaxing or working for pay.
This just tells me (and everyone else) that you believe that programming work has no value. That a programmer's time has less value than your uncle's cash. Has less value than your credit card debt. Has less value than your dignity - because you aren't willing to go to someone and ask for a loan, but you are willing to go to someone and ask for hard work.
posted by MesoFilter at 9:41 AM on June 27, 2009 [5 favorites]
This just tells me (and everyone else) that you believe that programming work has no value. That a programmer's time has less value than your uncle's cash. Has less value than your credit card debt. Has less value than your dignity - because you aren't willing to go to someone and ask for a loan, but you are willing to go to someone and ask for hard work.
posted by MesoFilter at 9:41 AM on June 27, 2009 [5 favorites]
Are you sure that there aren't people out there who are would-be-entrepreneurs who are happy to work on other's people's ideas for equity?
It's not impossible. But you need to give them a plausible reason why it's worthwhile (as I listed above.)
I've worked as a first-round employee in three startups. The first was a standard salary plus options. (it succeeded, mostly because of my point D above.) The second time around, I elected to take cash and no equity because I didn't expect the company to outlast its first round of angel funding. (It didn't.) The third one was the only case where I worked for pure equity, because I was co-founding it with a close friend who I had worked with before, and I knew for a fact that he was a fucking genius, and the job involved some interesting challenges. (It failed too.)
Look at it from the developer's point of view: you're experienced. You know for a fact that you can get a good salary doing what you do. You don't need to live on ramen. And you also know that most new businesses fail without ever making a profit. And if you're the sort of developer who's got any kind of entrepreneurial streak whatsoever, you've definitely got ideas of your own that you want to build.
So in order to take the gamble on working for somebody's else's untried business, you need to believe that that somebody else knows what they're doing, has an idea with a clear path to making enough money to make the risk worthwhile, which sounds interesting enough to work on to be worth the gamble, and most of all that that other person brings something to the mix beyond just "hey! I've got an idea!" As in: a proven track record, or skills at marketing or fundraising, or -- yeah -- if nothing else rich friends and family willing to invest. Everybody's got ideas. They're really not worth that much.
As MesoFilter says, asking someone to work for (nothing but) equity means that you haven't got any money, which means you probably haven't sorted out a business plan, which means you're probably not bringing anything to the table. It's a sign of probable amateurism.
(Incidentally, so is "I've got X million page views!" Page views mean nothing if you don't have any way to transform them into cash.) (So, too, is "it's a _______-like website", which means your idea is unoriginal and starts out in the shadow of an already well established 800-lb gorilla.)
posted by ook at 11:16 AM on June 27, 2009 [1 favorite]
It's not impossible. But you need to give them a plausible reason why it's worthwhile (as I listed above.)
I've worked as a first-round employee in three startups. The first was a standard salary plus options. (it succeeded, mostly because of my point D above.) The second time around, I elected to take cash and no equity because I didn't expect the company to outlast its first round of angel funding. (It didn't.) The third one was the only case where I worked for pure equity, because I was co-founding it with a close friend who I had worked with before, and I knew for a fact that he was a fucking genius, and the job involved some interesting challenges. (It failed too.)
Look at it from the developer's point of view: you're experienced. You know for a fact that you can get a good salary doing what you do. You don't need to live on ramen. And you also know that most new businesses fail without ever making a profit. And if you're the sort of developer who's got any kind of entrepreneurial streak whatsoever, you've definitely got ideas of your own that you want to build.
So in order to take the gamble on working for somebody's else's untried business, you need to believe that that somebody else knows what they're doing, has an idea with a clear path to making enough money to make the risk worthwhile, which sounds interesting enough to work on to be worth the gamble, and most of all that that other person brings something to the mix beyond just "hey! I've got an idea!" As in: a proven track record, or skills at marketing or fundraising, or -- yeah -- if nothing else rich friends and family willing to invest. Everybody's got ideas. They're really not worth that much.
As MesoFilter says, asking someone to work for (nothing but) equity means that you haven't got any money, which means you probably haven't sorted out a business plan, which means you're probably not bringing anything to the table. It's a sign of probable amateurism.
(Incidentally, so is "I've got X million page views!" Page views mean nothing if you don't have any way to transform them into cash.) (So, too, is "it's a _______-like website", which means your idea is unoriginal and starts out in the shadow of an already well established 800-lb gorilla.)
posted by ook at 11:16 AM on June 27, 2009 [1 favorite]
Hoping for a link to Jackson 5's million-plus pageviews website, I went to his profile, and found this:
This account is disabled.
Take My Ball and Go Home Filter?
posted by jayder at 12:38 PM on June 27, 2009
This account is disabled.
Take My Ball and Go Home Filter?
posted by jayder at 12:38 PM on June 27, 2009
This just tells me (and everyone else) that you believe that programming work has no value. That a programmer's time has less value than your uncle's cash. Has less value than your credit card debt. Has less value than your dignity - because you aren't willing to go to someone and ask for a loan, but you are willing to go to someone and ask for hard work.
Well-put. Damn, that is nicely expressed.
posted by jayder at 12:42 PM on June 27, 2009
Well-put. Damn, that is nicely expressed.
posted by jayder at 12:42 PM on June 27, 2009
Take My Ball and Go Home Filter?
More like take your ball and go away filter. (Speaking of signs of amateurism...)
posted by ook at 1:08 PM on June 27, 2009
More like take your ball and go away filter. (Speaking of signs of amateurism...)
posted by ook at 1:08 PM on June 27, 2009
You might try posting to http://news.ycombinator.com The guys who hang out there are generally start-up-minded coders. Supposedly, the average intelligence level is fairly high, though I would say this is becoming less true.
posted by maryrosecook at 2:01 PM on June 27, 2009
posted by maryrosecook at 2:01 PM on June 27, 2009
This thread is closed to new comments.
Be aware that as websites become more popular, they start to need programming teams, VPs, and business infrastructure, something one guy working for equity usually can't or won't provide.
posted by infinitewindow at 4:25 PM on June 26, 2009