A perceived risk of fish oil n−3 supplementation has been heavy metal poisoning by the body's accumulation of traces of heavy metals, in particular mercury, lead, nickel, arsenic and cadmium as well as other contaminants (PCBs, furans, dioxins), which potentially might be found especially in less-refined fish oil supplements. However, in reality, heavy metal toxicity from consuming fish oil supplements is highly unlikely. This is because heavy metals selectively bind with protein in the fish flesh rather than accumulate in the oil. An independent test in 2006 of 44 fish oils on the US market found that all of the products passed safety standards for potential contaminants.Sounds like contamination should be a non issue to me, even if you weren't buying the molecularly distilled variety. However, if you're still worried, maybe you can check to see if they've met some of the established standards for contaminants.
Historically, the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have published acceptable standards regarding contaminants in fish oil. The most stringent current standard is the International Fish Oils Standard (IFOS). Fish oils that typically make this highest grade are those that are molecularly distilled under vacuum, and have virtually no measurable level of contaminants (measured parts per billion and parts per trillion).Is there anything on the labelling about these standards? If not, maybe you can contact the manufacturer to find out whether or not they've been tested and what standards they meet.
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
posted by ninotchka at 12:12 PM on May 25