How do people on the Blue do it?
November 4, 2008 6:50 PM Subscribe
How do people find new and interesting links on the Web?
Every day, I read Metafilter, Boing Boing, kottke, etc. These sites all have links that I see for the first time on these sites.
Now, I know kottke and Boing Boing have users sending them links. But, my question is: how do these normal people find these links? Are there special techniques or things I'm not doing that helps others find new and interesting stuff whilst I view the fruits of their labor?
I guess what I'm asking is how people search for subjects and find new and undiscovered information about those subjects?
Every day, I read Metafilter, Boing Boing, kottke, etc. These sites all have links that I see for the first time on these sites.
Now, I know kottke and Boing Boing have users sending them links. But, my question is: how do these normal people find these links? Are there special techniques or things I'm not doing that helps others find new and interesting stuff whilst I view the fruits of their labor?
I guess what I'm asking is how people search for subjects and find new and undiscovered information about those subjects?
Every now and again, I do searches for digitization projects in my academic specialty (19th-c. British literature and culture), in the course of which I always find Very Cool Things. Very focused searches on a particular topic may yield paradoxically wide-ranging results.
posted by thomas j wise at 6:58 PM on November 4, 2008 [1 favorite]
posted by thomas j wise at 6:58 PM on November 4, 2008 [1 favorite]
Best answer: I follow del.icio.us tags on topics I like. I find a lot of "breaking" links this way. For example: http://del.icio.us/tag/iphone - there's a lot of noise, but that's how you find the good stuff.
del.icio.us's "popular" pages are also good and keep you ahead of most. For example: http://delicious.com/popular/iphone Also.. reddit/new is a good source. Digg Upcoming be interesting. If you follow a lot of people on Twitter, that can be an awesome source too. Stumbleupon can also be fine, but you get a mix of old and new stuff I find - a lot of cool stuff I find on StumbleUpon was found by people ages ago.
I consider most of the above to be primary sources to some extent. Sites like Kottke and Boing Boing are slower and more reactive from my POV - principally because they're not automated. It makes them higher quality, more focused, but.. slower.
posted by wackybrit at 7:23 PM on November 4, 2008 [1 favorite]
del.icio.us's "popular" pages are also good and keep you ahead of most. For example: http://delicious.com/popular/iphone Also.. reddit/new is a good source. Digg Upcoming be interesting. If you follow a lot of people on Twitter, that can be an awesome source too. Stumbleupon can also be fine, but you get a mix of old and new stuff I find - a lot of cool stuff I find on StumbleUpon was found by people ages ago.
I consider most of the above to be primary sources to some extent. Sites like Kottke and Boing Boing are slower and more reactive from my POV - principally because they're not automated. It makes them higher quality, more focused, but.. slower.
posted by wackybrit at 7:23 PM on November 4, 2008 [1 favorite]
Best answer: In case it wasn't clear, you can change the tags in the above del.icio.us URLs to find things on topics you'd rather look up. Examples:
http://delicious.com/popular/obama
http://delicious.com/popular/knitting
Or even http://delicious.com/popular/metafilter !
posted by wackybrit at 7:25 PM on November 4, 2008
http://delicious.com/popular/obama
http://delicious.com/popular/knitting
Or even http://delicious.com/popular/metafilter !
posted by wackybrit at 7:25 PM on November 4, 2008
Best answer: Google Alerts on topics of interest occasionally yield FPP gold, too.
posted by flabdablet at 7:31 PM on November 4, 2008
posted by flabdablet at 7:31 PM on November 4, 2008
I find that FriendFeed is a great source of interesting stuff, and subscribe to a few dozen blogs that I can blast through quickly with Google Reader.
Also, many of the memes you see making their way around the Web originate on message forums with huge membership bases such as SA.
posted by tomorama at 7:36 PM on November 4, 2008
Also, many of the memes you see making their way around the Web originate on message forums with huge membership bases such as SA.
posted by tomorama at 7:36 PM on November 4, 2008
Best answer: I sometimes go "backwards", in that I'll start with something I read in a book or magazine, (Fortean Times is a favorite) then check out what kind of web content there is on the subject. This seems to work reasonably well with "anomalous" subjects.
I like to surf Flickr groups, and people's contacts within Flickr. That way you can make quick "filtrations" of huge amounts of visual information. There are a boat-load of unusual but worthwhile groups on Flickr.
There is even this crazy technique of observing things and events in "the real world", then finding out if there is web content about it.
I need to do this more, but one weird technique is to simply google two unrelated terms together; usually one will be something abstract, and one concrete. Who knows what websites will arise of you google "extemporaneous" and "pesticide"... I think I learned this technique from Cliff Pickover.
posted by Tube at 12:59 AM on November 5, 2008
I like to surf Flickr groups, and people's contacts within Flickr. That way you can make quick "filtrations" of huge amounts of visual information. There are a boat-load of unusual but worthwhile groups on Flickr.
There is even this crazy technique of observing things and events in "the real world", then finding out if there is web content about it.
I need to do this more, but one weird technique is to simply google two unrelated terms together; usually one will be something abstract, and one concrete. Who knows what websites will arise of you google "extemporaneous" and "pesticide"... I think I learned this technique from Cliff Pickover.
posted by Tube at 12:59 AM on November 5, 2008
Very focused searches on a particular topic may yield paradoxically wide-ranging results.
Definitely. That's how I find interesting stuff. I google a particular topic, and keep trying different search terms, refining and tacking successive searches depending on the results or earlier ones.
posted by orange swan at 8:45 AM on November 5, 2008
Definitely. That's how I find interesting stuff. I google a particular topic, and keep trying different search terms, refining and tacking successive searches depending on the results or earlier ones.
posted by orange swan at 8:45 AM on November 5, 2008
Find one blog you like, and subscribe to it. When that blog links to something on another blog, give the linked blog a skim. If you like it, subscribe to its RSS feed. Lather, rinse, repeat.
It can snowball pretty quickly, so unless you want to deal with a million blog posts a day, you'll learn to trim it down to what you're really interested in. The more specialized the blogs' focus, the better; not only will you have less to sift through, but you'll tend to find the more in-depth, substantive stuff on those blogs to be much more satisfying.
StumbleUpon can be good for the random stuff, but it can get to be rather a) addictive, b) repetitive, and c) dodgy. I'd suggest surfing Wikipedia as a suitable substitute.
posted by Sys Rq at 8:51 AM on November 18, 2008
It can snowball pretty quickly, so unless you want to deal with a million blog posts a day, you'll learn to trim it down to what you're really interested in. The more specialized the blogs' focus, the better; not only will you have less to sift through, but you'll tend to find the more in-depth, substantive stuff on those blogs to be much more satisfying.
StumbleUpon can be good for the random stuff, but it can get to be rather a) addictive, b) repetitive, and c) dodgy. I'd suggest surfing Wikipedia as a suitable substitute.
posted by Sys Rq at 8:51 AM on November 18, 2008
I go to http://popurls.com every morning for my daily dose of interesting stories/news.
posted by jmmpangaea at 12:33 PM on November 24, 2008
posted by jmmpangaea at 12:33 PM on November 24, 2008
« Older How do I modify this script so I can change the... | Is air shipping much more inefficient than truck... Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by purephase at 6:57 PM on November 4, 2008