I am a hobbyist photographer starting to do some serious studio work and I need help deciding on lighting equipment.
To start, I run a website about collectibles. I find myself in a position of wanting to do "photo archives" of these collectibles, which range from very tiny Hallmark Christmas ornaments (1/4 inch in size) to very large items (3' long, 1' tall).
I started by using a fairly decent digital camera and the flash, or some desk lamps. I have slowly been upgrading my equipment and now have a Canon Digital Rebel XT, a hotshoe flash, and I bought a lightbox that shines light down on an item, and has white sides attempting to reflect the light onto the object.
It has mixed results. First, the box is too small for several items. Second, with the light being primarily from the top, the front of the item is often left in shadows.
Some self-links to photos to give examples of my current work follow:
One of the better examples of pre-lightbox photo
Picture from the lightbox; bright top, dark front
Overexposed from the lightbox
Circular items do poorly in the lightbox
Lately we've been photographing items
and I think it's helped a bit but we're not where I want to be.
So I am looking at a new lighting set-up. I'm driving to St. Louis this Friday to talk to people at camera stores, but I thought I'd ask here what might work best.
We were thinking of taping the gray fabric to a wall and setting up a table on which we can put items, but what type of lights do I need, and how many? I hear about linking strobes to a camera, but is that better than "always on" light rigs? Do I need diffusing umbrellas? Two lights (one from each side), or three (one from each side and one from the front?)
I'm willing to spend up to $500 on this if the need be (the less the better) but I really want to take ASTOUNDING photographs. I think I'm almost there, but can you help me figure out what is needed now?
(and while the still items are my primary concern, if I can also do portrait photography so much the better)
Finally, I've been primarily using the camera's autoexposure to get the lighting right; would a light meter really help? (I'm guessing I still need better lights IN ADDITION TO the light meter...)
Thanks!!
The best bang for your buck if you want to get studio strobes is Alien Bees, their entry level ones are $225, you could get two of those, some light stands, and two cheap shoot-through umbrellas for a little more than $500 which is all you would need. I highly recommend going this route because these are professional level strobes and you will get a lot of versatility out of them (there is a huge number of modifiers you can buy) and you will not be limited to just shooting products. Some people will say go the Strobist route and get small, hot-shoe flashes but I have never really been impressed by those, you do not get the versatility or power that you do with real strobes and the quality of light is just not that great because they are so small. You will end up spending about the same for no real benefits.
I am a professional and I use White Lightning strobes, which are higher end lights made by the same company as the AB's and I absolutely love them. Their customer service is second to none, even compared to ultra-high end stuff like Profoto.
Metering wise you should be shooting in manual with strobes (your in-camera meter cannot judge the light coming from strobes since the lights are flashes and not continuous). If you are shooting digital you don't really need a meter, you can judge exposure based off the histogram on your camera. With strobes the shutter speed is largely irrelevant, your exposure is controlled by the aperture.
posted by bradbane at 12:16 PM on September 8, 2008