Best Wireless ADSL2 Router with QOS
February 22, 2007 11:57 AM Subscribe
Best Wireless ADSL2 Router with QOS
I want to control the bandwidth that I'm sharing wirelessly with another computer.
I use NetLimiter on my pc, and very easily I can control the the amount of bandwidth each program is using. Image of what I do here: http://img261.imageshack.us/my.php?image=111vu5.jpg
I would like to be able to do the same with the PC I'm sharing with ie give them 10% or 512/128 in bandwidth.
Also, as I'm sharing wirelessly, I would like to know if anyone else is using my network. I'm presently using WPA-PSK. But it would be nice to see if anyone else is trying to use my broadband.
thanks
I want to control the bandwidth that I'm sharing wirelessly with another computer.
I use NetLimiter on my pc, and very easily I can control the the amount of bandwidth each program is using. Image of what I do here: http://img261.imageshack.us/my.php?image=111vu5.jpg
I would like to be able to do the same with the PC I'm sharing with ie give them 10% or 512/128 in bandwidth.
Also, as I'm sharing wirelessly, I would like to know if anyone else is using my network. I'm presently using WPA-PSK. But it would be nice to see if anyone else is trying to use my broadband.
thanks
A WRT-54GL with the DD-WRT firmware will do QoS. It will limit bandwidth based on the client, or the type of traffic. It has 4 or 5 levels of QoS, from "Bulk" up to an un-QoSed setting for things that need to be as close to real-time as possible. It seems to work pretty well, although it's not a PacketShaper -- if your clients aren't cooperative, it's still possible for them to disguise 'Bulk' traffic (e.g. P2P) as something else and avoid the QoS-ing.
DD-WRT also does other fun things, like true OSPF/RIP routing, bridging (with or without routing, NAT, or firewalling), even SIP stuff.
Just make sure you get a real WRT-54GL, and not the crippled pieces of junk they're pushing at Best Buy under the WRT-54G or GS marque.
posted by Kadin2048 at 2:05 PM on February 22, 2007
DD-WRT also does other fun things, like true OSPF/RIP routing, bridging (with or without routing, NAT, or firewalling), even SIP stuff.
Just make sure you get a real WRT-54GL, and not the crippled pieces of junk they're pushing at Best Buy under the WRT-54G or GS marque.
posted by Kadin2048 at 2:05 PM on February 22, 2007
The QOS feature in the DGL-4300 gets mixed reviews. It seems if you pussyfoot around with the upload/download, it can improve responsiveness somewhat, but if you really hammer it, the feature is overwhelmed.
The reasoning I've read is consistent with kindall's comment. I think that either a WRT-54GL, or a dedicating linux system filling the role of router, is the way to go.
Personally, I just added some scheduling rules to throttle other activity at peak gaming hours.
posted by Chuckles at 9:47 PM on February 22, 2007
The reasoning I've read is consistent with kindall's comment. I think that either a WRT-54GL, or a dedicating linux system filling the role of router, is the way to go.
Personally, I just added some scheduling rules to throttle other activity at peak gaming hours.
posted by Chuckles at 9:47 PM on February 22, 2007
Err.. That might read as if it is inconsistent, but it really isn't. As kindall said, if the limitations seem acceptable, then try the D-link unit. To me, it didn't seem good enough. My internet service is very slow, and a relatively slow download of 100kb/s is enough to be in the "really hammering" category.
posted by Chuckles at 9:57 PM on February 22, 2007
posted by Chuckles at 9:57 PM on February 22, 2007
It helps with the D-Link if you prioritize outbound traffic to destination ports 80, etc. as well as DNS so that your ACKs for Web requests and downloads get out in a timely fashion even if your outbound pipe is full.
It basically eliminated my VOIP breakups without requiring me to put my VOIP box in front of the router, too (which I didn't want to do because it was way slower than my Internet connection).
The D-Link device does not prioritize inbound traffic at all, only outbound.
I may have to try the DD-WRT firmware, it looks cheap enough to get a router and play with it.
posted by kindall at 10:03 PM on February 22, 2007
It basically eliminated my VOIP breakups without requiring me to put my VOIP box in front of the router, too (which I didn't want to do because it was way slower than my Internet connection).
The D-Link device does not prioritize inbound traffic at all, only outbound.
I may have to try the DD-WRT firmware, it looks cheap enough to get a router and play with it.
posted by kindall at 10:03 PM on February 22, 2007
This thread is closed to new comments.
I would like to know if anyone else is using my network. I'm presently using WPA-PSK.
Then (assuming you didn't pick an obvious password) nobody else is using your network.
posted by kindall at 12:22 PM on February 22, 2007