Does CASL mean that I can't send cold emails?
September 17, 2018 6:35 PM Subscribe
If I send emails to potential clients that I haven't made contact with before to let them know about my services, would that violate CASL? My potential clients are people who are accountants and I'd only be contacting those who had their information available on their website. Is this something that would that be allowed under "implied consent, conspicuous publication", assuming that what I'd be contacting them about is relevant to their business?
Publicly available addresses did not opt into your mailings. Source: I literally work in email compliance and shut down accounts for not having permission every single day
posted by masquesoporfavor at 7:17 AM on September 18, 2018
posted by masquesoporfavor at 7:17 AM on September 18, 2018
Response by poster: masquesoporfavor: I found on this page that says:
"Can I send CEMs to an email address I find online?
You can only rely on this conspicuous publication—or in other words, when someone posts or publishes their email address—when:
There is no statement in connection with the address that the person does not want to receive CEMs at that address; and
The content of your CEM is relevant to the recipient's business, role, functions, or duties in a business or official capacity."
Doesn't that mean that it's ok to send the email? Or am I missing something? It sounds like the person doesn't need to explicitly opt in?
posted by Proginoskes at 10:51 AM on September 18, 2018
"Can I send CEMs to an email address I find online?
You can only rely on this conspicuous publication—or in other words, when someone posts or publishes their email address—when:
There is no statement in connection with the address that the person does not want to receive CEMs at that address; and
The content of your CEM is relevant to the recipient's business, role, functions, or duties in a business or official capacity."
Doesn't that mean that it's ok to send the email? Or am I missing something? It sounds like the person doesn't need to explicitly opt in?
posted by Proginoskes at 10:51 AM on September 18, 2018
This thread is closed to new comments.
This link describes a situation in which a company was fined several hundred thousand dollars, despite claiming that their email campaign fell under the conspicuous publication rule, because: So if anybody complains, the burden is on you to have all of that documentation available for every single email address.
posted by teraflop at 11:43 PM on September 17, 2018 [1 favorite]