Please help me figure out this snowflake-looking career pickle.
May 2, 2013 3:21 AM   Subscribe

I'm a manager in my field who, in moving to a new city, got into. Things were looking great, but unexpectedly the company shut down two weeks in. Now I'm looking for a managerial job again, and I need to know how to explain this.

Coming from a senior management position in one city, I moved to another. The whole job search process took a grueling six months. At the last minute the offers started coming in. One of them was an offer for a management title -- with a way lower salary than my previous job -- albeit from the most recognizable company in the country.

The job that I did end up taking was a specialist position in the same department but a new field. The pay was higher than what I was earning in my last job. I loved my job and the people right away. But all of us got laid off when I was about to cap off my second week into the job.

Now, I'm looking for management positions again, but I don't know how to explain my career move by taking a specialist position in a way that will paint me better than just being "after the money". It just seems like a bad move to just settle back into a nonmanagerial position and for less pay: a one step forward, three steps backward situation that I don't think I'd be able to recover from. I can't move back into my old city, either; there's a reason I left.

TL;DR question: from senior manager to specialist and now looking for a management job again: how do I make it happen without looking unsuitable?
posted by drea to Work & Money (4 answers total)
 
Say you were intrigued by the challenge but that unfortunately the mass layoff put the kibosh on that chance.

Or just leave it off your CV entirely.
posted by inturnaround at 3:45 AM on May 2, 2013 [1 favorite]


but I don't know how to explain my career move by taking a specialist position in a way that will paint me better than just being "after the money"

I don't get this. What is wrong with taking a particular job for no other reason than that it pays more? Companies are motivated by profit, why should not individual employees be equally motivated by salary?

- Why did you take that specialist job?

"It was offered to me and it seemed interesting and it paid a lot more than I had been making so I decided to give it a chance."

- Why are you taking a job that pays less money now?

"I only had that job for two weeks. I think I am more likely to find a stable position doing what I was doing before."

I would leave it off your CV in years to come, but for now it's a nice amusing anecdote for your interviews and you should use it as such.

(P.S. I have a neighbor who has had this happen twice in quick succession. She joked in her interviews that things never happen in threes.)
posted by three blind mice at 5:20 AM on May 2, 2013 [2 favorites]


It's just two weeks. Your six month search + 2 weeks is like, 28 weeks instead of 26 weeks. Just roll the position into your existing search.
posted by colin_l at 5:25 AM on May 2, 2013


If it's a job with the most recognizable name, that's the best data point to stress. You took this unusual step to get into a position that was interesting for a recognizable company, and then you got laid off. It's a perfectly understandable scenario.
posted by xingcat at 6:46 AM on May 2, 2013


« Older All the todo's that's fit to email   |   Let go of job after 12 yrs Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.