What is reflected in Vice President Cheney's glasses?
April 10, 2008 4:18 PM
Awesome/tragic. I'm obviously missing something... how did you find the hi-res version?
posted by East Manitoba Regional Junior Kabaddi Champion '94 at 4:24 PM on April 10, 2008
posted by East Manitoba Regional Junior Kabaddi Champion '94 at 4:24 PM on April 10, 2008
[Question is more or less answered. If you've got something substantial to add, fine, but keep the jokes to yourself.]
posted by cortex at 5:06 PM on April 10, 2008
posted by cortex at 5:06 PM on April 10, 2008
McClatchy Newspapers: Is That Really a Naked Woman in Dick Cheney's Sunglasses?
“He shot his hunting partner, but Vice President Dick Cheney apparently doesn't fly fish with naked women.posted by ericb at 7:54 PM on April 10, 2008
Since Wednesday, the blogosphere has been atwitter over a photograph on the White House Web site of Cheney with a caption that said he was fly-fishing on the Snake River in Idaho.
The photo is a tight shot of Cheney's face sporting dark sunglasses and his trademark grin.
What's stirring all the buzz is the reflection in the vice president's dark glasses. Some thought that the reflection looked like a naked woman and, this being Cheney and this being the Internet Age, they immediately shared that thought with the world.
In a Google search for the words ‘Dick Cheney’ and ‘sunglasses,’ 79,300 hits came back at mid-afternoon on Thursday. By 7 p.m., the count was 130,000.
On DemocraticUnderground.com, the discussion starts with this question: ‘Notice anything ... interesting ... reflected in his sunglasses? Something that has little to do with conventional 'fly-fishing'?’
It wasn't just the blogosphere. On a Web site called sportsshooter.com, dedicated to sports photography, professionals also did a double take and debated the shot on their message board.
‘Naked woman??????? That explains his heart problems!!!’ noted photographer Jason Frizzelle of Greenville, N.C.
‘Holy crap! Is that what I think it is?’ wrote one reader of the blog ‘A Welsh View.’
‘At first glance, I thought it was a naked woman as well,’ wrote Jody Gomez, a photographer from Murrietta, Calif. ‘However after close study and a second opinion ... I believe it's his arm.’ Others, including some White House staffers, saw the profile of a man's face and a cigar.
...The vice president's office saw little humor in the buzz.
‘Clearly the picture shows a hand casting a rod,’ grumbled spokeswoman Meagan Mitchell.
As journalists, however, the word of an official spokeswoman isn't good enough.
So McClatchy/Tribune Information Services photo editor George Bridges used the latest digital technology to enlarge the picture, took a close look at Cheney's sunglasses and concluded that Mitchell was telling the truth.
The image is of the vice president's hand on his fly rod.
‘In one lens of his sunglasses you can clearly tell it is a sleeved arm of Cheney or a fishing companion. The other lens has an extreme distortion that, without looking at it closely, could be misconstrued,’ said investigative photo editor Bridges.”
In the late 70's, a lot of people thought that advertisers were subliminally embedding images of genitalia into ads. Whether they really made you more likely to buy the product is probably a great study in junk science, but I guess if you were more apt to linger on the ad for whatever reason, the ad might have had a better impression than one without. On the other hand, a lot of the examples were so bizarre and subtle, it makes you realize that Rorschach isn't only about ink blots.
posted by Dave Faris at 10:23 AM on April 11, 2008
posted by Dave Faris at 10:23 AM on April 11, 2008
« Older Identify the legend: How Shiva tricked the human... | laser cutters or metal casters near san francisco? Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/photoessays/outdoors/images/v081905db-0162.jpg
posted by comwiz at 4:21 PM on April 10, 2008