It's Bad For You!
May 5, 2004 8:41 PM Subscribe
I'm trying to write an essay on the current nostalgia for guilt-free (and information-free!) smoking, boozing and drug-taking and desperately need sources, whether web-based or bibliographical. [
More inside.]
For example, from 1933 to 1953 The Journal of the American Medical Association regularly carried
cigarette advertisements and web sites like
this one have several examples of smoking advertised as a health solution rather than a problem.
Does anyone know of 20th Century sources for recklessly irresponsible advocacies of drinking, smoking and experimenting with drugs? Or, more importantly, of how guilt and knowledge used to be dealt with? Specially of the "I don't want to know" variety.
Any help will be much appreciated.
posted by MiguelCardoso to society & culture (15 answers total) 1 user marked this as a favorite
For drugs, there's the Vin Mariani which is a wine soaked in coca extract (cocaine) that was endorsed as a great elixir, and panacea by the Pope, and other big names at the time.
Heroin and cocaine, of course, were both tauted for their medicinal value in magazines all the way up until right before World War I I believe. I don't think this is what you're looking for. My understanding is you want ads that promote recreational drug/alcohol use before the consequences were fully known. Well it was not in vogue to use drugs recreationally when they were first discovered and it was known quite quickly that they form a dependence and shouldn't be used carelessly (see New Jersey junk yard heroin addicts, selling junk for smack money, "junkies").
Marijuana use, which is still really debatable if it even has significant health problems, was never even tauted for its medicinal use if I am correct. It was not very well known and barely tolerated as its use was by the migrant Mexican population then the southern blacks, eventually moving north.
You may find this Car Sagan essay on marijuana useful. I don't know how much though.
Also try looking for Timothy Leary's ramblings about LSD. Once again I think you're looking for something that was once thought of as healthy and isn't. LSD has am extremely low toxicity and no known long term health side effects. You might want to check out some of the CIA uses of LSD, before they knew what it did. But this is not recreational.
I'm sure you're aware of Victorian uses of opium (Kubla Kahn, Confessions of an Opium Eater or whatever it was called), which is what you're going to have to go to for the coveted "known to be bad now, not known to be bad then and used recreationally" criteria you set forth.
Beyond cigarettes you will have a very hard time finding any recreational substance that is unhealthy and used purely recreationally throughout its history of being used.
posted by geoff. at 9:37 PM on May 5, 2004