Can my landlord charge me twice for carpet cleaning?
August 5, 2006 11:48 PM
Subscribe
My new landlord company is trying to get me to pay for carpet cleaning when my lease clearly states that it is included in the "Restoration Fee". Can they do this?
I leased my apartment under University Commons, and over the year they were bought out by Lions' Crossing. My lease says:
"5. Restoration Fee: You agree to pay ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($125.00) as a restoration fee upon signing this lease. Upon vacating the premises, we may use the restoration fee to paint, clean, shampoo the carpets, and for maintenance labor and materials. If the cost to restore the leased premises exceeds the $125.00 you agree to pay the additional costs"
I recently received a letter from Lions' Crossing saying that we are responsible for contacting a carpet cleaning company and paying for it ourselves. I asked the lease manager, and she said this was in the rules, under 'care and maintenance of property'. Here's what that says.
"CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY: Tenant agrees to maintain the property as follows:
A: Keep the property clean and free of debris and filth
B: Keep all appliances clean and use them in a manner that is safe and consistant with their purpose, and
C: Keep the common grounds of the property clean and free of litter and debris"
She says that they are interpreting that as saying that I have to get someone to shampoo the carpets, which doesn't make sense.
I eventually talked to another manager, who said that they are going to be painting, which will cost around $500 for the apartment, which equals out to the $125 each. There is no real reason to paint the apartment, since we're in a college town and there are only minimal marks on the walls. I know that they are technically allowed to do this, since it says that we have to pay the extra, but it feels like I am getting screwed over somehow.
So I already paid an extra $125, and it seems like I have to pay more now. Any help? I really can't afford this right now, but I keep getting the same story every time at the office.
Thanks!
posted by amicamentis to law & government (16 comments total)
2 users marked this as a favorite
However, in the end, it seems to me that you have two options in this situation; the careful and the easy. The easy first:
1) It doesn't say that you have to shampoo the carpet. So don't. Ignore the letter, clean the carpet as best you can, and leave. If they bug you about it, tell them you're not required to. If they say you won't get your deposit back, write them a nasty little letter telling them you're taking them to small claims court. That should make them return your deposit; so long as your carpets are clean (I'm assuming they don't really need shampooing) they really most likely won't care enough to hassle you. Management companies have too much shit to deal with to sit around arguing about whether someone should shampoo a clean carpet, so you'll almost certainly be in the clear.
2) The safe way: I don't know how much carpet you have, but it's a snap to shampoo carpet yourself. Go to Wal-Mart or Home Depot and rent a carpet-shampoo machine. The whole thing'll cost less than twenty or thirty bucks or so, and it'll only take a little bit longer than vacuuming. I also don't know if they've specifically told you that you have to hire a professional to do this; if they haven't, don't ask, just do it yourself. Again, management companies just want the result; once the carpet's clean, they probably won't argue any more.
I should say that I've had a few landlords who told me, "you'd better get the carpets shampooed when you leave." I don't say that you should ignore them; only pay attention to the spirit of the law. Landlords say that because they've been burned by dipshits who leave the carpet stained. Leave the carpet clean, and the management company won't care how or why it's clean. Believe me.
posted by koeselitz at 12:12 AM on August 6, 2006