A single word which means "negatively defined"?
April 7, 2006 10:07 AM
Is there a single word which means "negatively defined" (or "defined by its opposite" or "defined by not being other things" or "defined by the absence of something")? In English if you can manage (I cannot think of one), but maybe in another language? German perhaps?
When you have a pair of words that describe opposite or mutually exclusive sets or conditions, the word pairs involved are called antonyms. Fair/unfair, hot/cold, American/un-American, light/dark, etc. In each case, one word is, or can be, defined by not being the other, by the absence of the other, or by being the opposite of the other.
posted by beagle at 10:42 AM on April 7, 2006
posted by beagle at 10:42 AM on April 7, 2006
This probably won't be particularly helpful, but in law there is a principle of construction that says that the exclusion of one thing implies the existence of the opposite (or vice versa). The Latin phrase for this principle is "expressio unius est exlusio alterius".
posted by pardonyou? at 10:52 AM on April 7, 2006
posted by pardonyou? at 10:52 AM on April 7, 2006
in grad school we used the unwieldy phrase "constituting other" for what it sounds like you're talking about. Simple examples are "non-males" or "non-whites."
posted by small_ruminant at 10:57 AM on April 7, 2006
posted by small_ruminant at 10:57 AM on April 7, 2006
Prokaryote.
Defined as "not a eukaryote". Characteristics are generally lack of specific structures found in eukaryotes (nucleus, for example). It's not your answer, but it's a specific example of what you mean: Maybe can help someone else come up with the word you are looking for.
It isn't an antonym, it isn't the opposite, it's just a category defined as "not the other". If you find the word, I want to know it.
posted by caution live frogs at 10:58 AM on April 7, 2006
Defined as "not a eukaryote". Characteristics are generally lack of specific structures found in eukaryotes (nucleus, for example). It's not your answer, but it's a specific example of what you mean: Maybe can help someone else come up with the word you are looking for.
It isn't an antonym, it isn't the opposite, it's just a category defined as "not the other". If you find the word, I want to know it.
posted by caution live frogs at 10:58 AM on April 7, 2006
now that I consider, I think the constituting Others in my examples would be "male" and "white," so it won't do you any good. Sorry.
posted by small_ruminant at 11:02 AM on April 7, 2006
posted by small_ruminant at 11:02 AM on April 7, 2006
Contrary? "An object, fact, or quality that is the very opposite of something else"
Converse? "A thing or action which is the exact opposite of another"
posted by aneel at 11:13 AM on April 7, 2006
Converse? "A thing or action which is the exact opposite of another"
posted by aneel at 11:13 AM on April 7, 2006
The rhetorical figure apophasis, adj. apophatic.
I hear the word mostly used in the context of apophatic theology, popular in medieval times and among certain mystic schools. The subject of theology (God) is taken as a given, and which is so different from all other things that we can only describe it in terms of what it is not. For example, God is so Good, whatever Goodness we may conceive of falls so short of the subject that it is bad in comparison.
The general rhetorical figure does not necessarily imply all that stuff, however.
posted by sonofsamiam at 11:18 AM on April 7, 2006
I hear the word mostly used in the context of apophatic theology, popular in medieval times and among certain mystic schools. The subject of theology (God) is taken as a given, and which is so different from all other things that we can only describe it in terms of what it is not. For example, God is so Good, whatever Goodness we may conceive of falls so short of the subject that it is bad in comparison.
The general rhetorical figure does not necessarily imply all that stuff, however.
posted by sonofsamiam at 11:18 AM on April 7, 2006
I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but the phoneme 'r' is defined as not being any other phoneme.
posted by nakedsushi at 11:46 AM on April 7, 2006
posted by nakedsushi at 11:46 AM on April 7, 2006
Yeah, to clarify, I'm not looking for a word that means "opposite", but more like what small_ruminant and caution live frogs are talking about. I was kind of hoping there would be some insane German phrase-word (that-which-is-defined-by-its-lack-of-being-another, or the like). I'm happy with all these other phrase examples though. They are interesting cross-disciplinary parallels.
posted by unknowncommand at 11:49 AM on April 7, 2006
posted by unknowncommand at 11:49 AM on April 7, 2006
exactly, nakedsushi, so if you had to come up with a one word adjective/noun to describe/name the phoneme 'r' in that capacity, what would it be?
posted by unknowncommand at 11:51 AM on April 7, 2006
posted by unknowncommand at 11:51 AM on April 7, 2006
sonofsiam got the word I was grasping for--apophasis. I confess I did a double take when he mentioned "I hear the word mostly used..." -- I have never heard the word used at all! But I've seen it written down, and I think this is the best candidate.
posted by adamrice at 12:03 PM on April 7, 2006
posted by adamrice at 12:03 PM on April 7, 2006
Oh! Or maybe sonofsamiam has it (sorry, just now read the link). It's close at least.
posted by unknowncommand at 12:10 PM on April 7, 2006
posted by unknowncommand at 12:10 PM on April 7, 2006
It's not exactly what you're looking for but it might lead to the right answer. I dunno. Maybe not. It's just a cool word, ok!?.
Enantiodromia
posted by lyam at 12:22 PM on April 7, 2006
Enantiodromia
posted by lyam at 12:22 PM on April 7, 2006
The opposite of apophatic, "attained through negation," by the way, is cataphatic, "attained through affirmation."
posted by Mo Nickels at 12:40 PM on April 7, 2006
posted by Mo Nickels at 12:40 PM on April 7, 2006
depending on the context and which of your original meanings you were working around ("negatively defined," "defined by its opposite," etc.) you might also use:
(a) différance (the French post-structuralist version)
(b) contradistinction
(c) lacuna (again, French post-structuralism)
(d) deduction (as in subtractive reasoning)
posted by mrmojoflying at 1:09 PM on April 7, 2006
(a) différance (the French post-structuralist version)
(b) contradistinction
(c) lacuna (again, French post-structuralism)
(d) deduction (as in subtractive reasoning)
posted by mrmojoflying at 1:09 PM on April 7, 2006
Litotes? "[U]nderstatement, for intensification, by denying the contrary of the thing being affirmed." I guess that's a property of the description rather than the thing being described, though.
posted by letourneau at 3:26 PM on April 7, 2006
posted by letourneau at 3:26 PM on April 7, 2006
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by booksandlibretti at 10:13 AM on April 7, 2006