Breaking up is hard to do
March 10, 2018 4:01 PM Subscribe
Sorry, this is not a question of the heart. While laboriously taking apart a jigsaw puzzle, it occurred to me, how do the commercial companies avoid this tedium? Is there an easier way?
MY understanding is that, once a jigsaw puzzle is stamped, it goes to a machine called a "breaker", where some process separates the puzzle into a thousand pieces and puts it into a bag. My question is, how does this breaker work? Anyone who tries shaking a puzzle apart knows that simple shaking is not going to produce the 99% separation that you get when you open a puzzle bag. (I leave out this method's potential for losing pieces under the sofa). Are they using super high frequency? Is a little old fashioned banging required? Whatever it is, can it be adapted to home use to get, say, an 85% separation? Your superior insights are appreciated.
MY understanding is that, once a jigsaw puzzle is stamped, it goes to a machine called a "breaker", where some process separates the puzzle into a thousand pieces and puts it into a bag. My question is, how does this breaker work? Anyone who tries shaking a puzzle apart knows that simple shaking is not going to produce the 99% separation that you get when you open a puzzle bag. (I leave out this method's potential for losing pieces under the sofa). Are they using super high frequency? Is a little old fashioned banging required? Whatever it is, can it be adapted to home use to get, say, an 85% separation? Your superior insights are appreciated.
Best answer: Check out 3:40 in this video.
posted by suedehead at 4:33 PM on March 10, 2018 [3 favorites]
posted by suedehead at 4:33 PM on March 10, 2018 [3 favorites]
Best answer: It's only on screen for a split second, but you can see it at :50 here.
posted by O9scar at 4:37 PM on March 10, 2018 [2 favorites]
posted by O9scar at 4:37 PM on March 10, 2018 [2 favorites]
Response by poster: Thank you for the videos: where you start with Google determines where you finish, and I would never have found these. I had hoped for a simple principle which I could scale down to a low-tech solution, albeit with a corresponding sacrifice in time or precision; but these are serious machines that don't appear to offer an easy way down. The existing manual methods of taking a puzzle apart offend me because of their lack of speed and elegance, but it seems I will have to persevere...
posted by alonsoquijano at 6:13 PM on March 11, 2018
posted by alonsoquijano at 6:13 PM on March 11, 2018
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by Athanassiel at 4:15 PM on March 10, 2018 [2 favorites]