Before vs. Behind - which is correct here?
August 26, 2008 12:33 PM   Subscribe

Which preposition is the correct choice in this context?

I take great pride in making facebook invitations to parties I throw, making unique logos for each one, and carefully crafting a fun narrative for the body of the invite. However one sentence prompted my roommate (who does not possess the finest command of grammar herself) to correct me, and I was curious to know who was correct. I am not a master of english myself -- i do make grammatical errors from time to time -- so I'm no angel here either.

Anyway, the sentence in the invite is:

"If traveling on Apple St, our building is the one directly behind the tennis court."

She corrected me to say the building is *before* the tennis court.

Here is a makeshift diagram of our apartment, a is Apple St, t is the tennis court, ** is our apartment, and HH are other apartments. You you be walking towards the tennis courts. Also, as you are approaching my apartment, you will see the tennis courts first.

attttttttttttt
a
a
a**HHHHH
a

Thanks much for helping to satisfy a curiosity! =)
posted by FireStyle to Writing & Language (34 answers total) 2 users marked this as a favorite
 
I would say "before".
posted by RussHy at 12:39 PM on August 26, 2008


If they walk past your apartment before the tennis courts (and it looks like they do) then you say "before." By using "behind," you imply that they need to walk past the tennis courts first before encountering your apartment.
posted by Polychrome at 12:42 PM on August 26, 2008


I think "behind" is correct, if you walk past the tennis courts first (as if, in your diagram, I would be walking from top to bottom). However, I am really not understanding directionality here. ???
posted by AlliKat75 at 12:45 PM on August 26, 2008


Use compass points. "If traveling north on Apple St, our building is the one directly south of the tennis court."
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 12:46 PM on August 26, 2008 [2 favorites]


So I would see your building after I see the tennis courts? If I'm understanding that correctly, I don't know how it could possibly be correct to say the building is before the tennis courts.

Polychrome seems to have the opposite understanding of mine, though, so maybe I'm wrong.
posted by Dec One at 12:59 PM on August 26, 2008


CPB - not to nitpick, but in your example the building in question is the one directly south of the tennis court regardless of the direction the traveler is going.
posted by grateful at 1:08 PM on August 26, 2008


"Behind" suggests that the tennis courts are between your apartment and Apple Street; ie. that your apartment is set back from the road with the tennis courts in front of it. This seems not to be the case, according to the map.
Your description is a bit confusing—"you you be walking" is no kind of grammar!—but: if you're going South on Apple Street your apartment is after the tennis courts; if you're going North on Apple street your apartment is before the tennis courts. "In front of" and "behind" do not appear to be applicable prepositions.
posted by nowonmai at 1:11 PM on August 26, 2008


Response by poster: When you are walking (or driving for that matter) on my street, you will most definitely see the tennis courts first, because it is an elevated structure. It is a landmark you will see before you see my building my apartment. only a small road separates the entrance to my apartment and the courts.

Also the diagram is read from the bottom up.
posted by FireStyle at 1:11 PM on August 26, 2008


Compass directions would be the least ambiguous, but in the situation you describe (walking on Apple St., reaching tennis courts before apartment) and using your "diagram" as a guide, I would say you're both wrong and the best word to use would be "beyond".

Also, this is not a matter of grammar but of preference and clarity.
posted by adamdschneider at 1:14 PM on August 26, 2008


Let me get this straight. You're walking along Apple Street. First, you see the tennis courts. Later, as you get closer, you see the apartments, in front of the tennis courts?
posted by Dec One at 1:14 PM on August 26, 2008


I should have previewed. While I still don't think this is a grammar matter, given your clarification I would consider your roommate more correct in that even though you see the tennis courts first, you reach the apartment first and thus it's difficult to say in what sense you could consider the apartment behind the courts, at least for the purposes of navigation in that specific direction down the street with that specific destination.
posted by adamdschneider at 1:17 PM on August 26, 2008


Definitely 'before', although this seems so obvious I can't help but think I'm missing something.
posted by greytape at 1:17 PM on August 26, 2008


This isn't a question of grammar as much as it is a question of clarity, and it's best to be as clear as possible when it comes to driving directions.

If someone is traveling on Apple St. and they pass the tennis courts first and then your apartment (which is my interpretation), then it is just past the tennis courts.

If they are traveling on Apple and pass your apartment first and then the tennis courts, your apartment is before the courts.

If Apple is not a one-way street and it's possible people could approach from either direction, use north/south terminology as Cool Papa Bell recommends.

I wouldn't say "behind" in any of these circumstances. When buildings are described as "behind" other landmarks it generally implies that the building is set back from the street. "Behind the house," for example, would often be the backyard.
posted by Metroid Baby at 1:18 PM on August 26, 2008


I'd just leave the tennis courts out of it and give a number address. The tennis courts seem to be confusing people.

"The party will be at #66 Apple Street."
posted by gyusan at 1:18 PM on August 26, 2008 [1 favorite]


The tennis courts are confusing people because the OP is giving conflicting information about where they are.
posted by Dec One at 1:23 PM on August 26, 2008


I would only use "behind" if the apartment building is set further back from the street than the tennis courts:

a
a
a ttttt hhhhhh
a
a
a
posted by emelenjr at 1:24 PM on August 26, 2008


it's difficult to say in what sense you could consider the apartment behind the courts

This is what's bothering me, too.
posted by Dec One at 1:26 PM on August 26, 2008


Response by poster: lol... let me try this again...

diagram v.2


* *
* * TTTTTTTT
* * TTTTTTTT
* * ********
*
* * ********
* * HH
* *
*a *

^
^
^


A is apple street, and the arrows indicate that I'm traveling from the bottom, up... *towards* the tennis courts (T). HH is my apartment.

If traveling on apple st, you will see the tennis courts because it is elevated... so as soon as you turn onto apple st, you will see the courts. However you still have to walk a little ways before you reach my house. So I used "behind" because from the vantage point of the person walking to my apartment, you will first see the tennis courts, and directly behind it is apartment.

Hope that clarifies it some!

[q] "you you be walking" is no kind of grammar! [/q]
My apologies, I suck at typing, and don't look at the screen... that's a typo... I meant you would be =)
posted by FireStyle at 1:27 PM on August 26, 2008


You may see the tennis courts first, but according to your diagram, your apartment building is not BEHIND the tennis courts. The Empire State Building is huge, and I can see it from a distance, but that does not mean that all of the buildings I pass along the way to the building are BEHIND it.
posted by emelenjr at 1:32 PM on August 26, 2008 [1 favorite]


"...next to the tennis courts."

"If you get to the tennis courts you've gone too far."
posted by rhizome at 1:34 PM on August 26, 2008


Might I suggest just saying,
"my apartment is by the tennis courts" or "beside the tennis courts",

or

"As you approach my apartment building along Apple Street you're gonna see some tennis courts. But I don't live there; I live in the building next to them."
posted by wabbittwax at 1:35 PM on August 26, 2008


So, with the additional info, "behind" is out of the question. Judging from your diagram, is there something wrong with "across the street?" How about "below?"
posted by rhizome at 1:36 PM on August 26, 2008


So I used "behind" because from the vantage point of the person walking to my apartment, you will first see the tennis courts, and directly behind it is apartment.

This conflicts with your diagram. According to your diagram, from the vantage point of the person walking to your apartment, the apartment is directly in front of the tennis courts, not behind them.
posted by Dec One at 1:40 PM on August 26, 2008


Based on your diagram your apartment is not behind the tennis courts (though I don't see how you could see the tennis courts first when walking down a straight road)

Of course, the truth is that the direction of travel (which was not specified in your sentence) determines whether the tennis courts are in front of or behind - although really, you are neither in front or behind, you are next to them in relation to the street.
posted by missmagenta at 1:43 PM on August 26, 2008


Response by poster: Oh, ok I see what you guys are saying and before does make a lot of sense. So not to beat a dead horse... one more thing to add to completely satisfy my curiosity...

in Emelenjr's response in saying "The Empire State Building is huge, and I can see it from a distance, but that does not mean that all of the buildings I pass along the way to the building are BEHIND it," About about a building in the same complex (as the tennis courts are in my complex... didn't add that, my apologies" I wouldn't say Frankie's Pizza is behind the Empire State building, but how about a newspaper stand on the premises? wouldn't that stand in that case be directly behind the Empire State Building? Or the shed is behind the house, because it is on the same property? just a thought, and thanks much for the enlightening discussion =)
posted by FireStyle at 1:45 PM on August 26, 2008


I wouldn't say Frankie's Pizza is behind the Empire State building, but how about a newspaper stand on the premises? wouldn't that stand in that case be directly behind the Empire State Building?

It depends on where you are standing. If this is the case (overhead map):

you

empire state building

newspaper stand


Then the newspaper stand is behind the Empire State Building.

If this is the case:

you

newspaper stand

empire state building


Then the newspaper stand is in front of the Empire State Building.

Something cannot be both in front of and behind something else at the same time, and it depends on your perspective which is which.
posted by burnmp3s at 2:00 PM on August 26, 2008


I see the sense in which the apartment could be said to be "behind" the tennis court: if you walked along the street in the direction indicated, when you got to the tennis courts, if you didn't turn around, the apartment would be behind you. Alternative way of imagining this: if you are looking down the street from the starting point of FireStyle's diagram, you might think of the buildings along the street as being like cars traveling in the same direction as you. Buildings closer to you would therefore be "behind" the buildings farther from you.

Nevertheless: I think it would be clearer to most people to say that the apartment is just before the tennis court.

On preview, maybe I'm not "getting" FireStyle at all, because the following makes no sense to me: "I wouldn't say Frankie's Pizza is behind the Empire State building, but how about a newspaper stand on the premises? wouldn't that stand in that case be directly behind the Empire State Building? Or the shed is behind the house, because it is on the same property?"
posted by Orinda at 2:05 PM on August 26, 2008


If you're really picky about grammar, you might not want to have that apartment building careening down Apple St.
posted by Neiltupper at 2:06 PM on August 26, 2008 [2 favorites]


23skidoo has got it.
posted by Orinda at 2:53 PM on August 26, 2008


"Behind" is no good, "before" is better, but compass directions are always the best way to give directions/orientations. So "south of the tennis courts" is the winner.
posted by zardoz at 8:07 AM on August 27, 2008


Use whichever one you want, and provide clear illustrations. And, if you're in a big city, you can probably use all kinds of Google Maps goodness to make it blaringly obvious.
posted by Citrus at 11:44 AM on August 27, 2008


This is hilarious. What would Picasso say if he were having a party near some tennis courts?

Consider this comment another vote against "behind." Just give your address.
posted by billtron at 10:38 PM on August 27, 2008


Response by poster: well met.... well this was fun lol. thank's for all the replies. I will update future directions. Regardless of before or behind in the instruction, its just about impossible to miss the place... there are really no other options! But it is better not to sound ignorant in my writing if it can be helped, so before it is! =)

thanks all
posted by FireStyle at 1:04 PM on August 29, 2008


Best answer: Having seen the apartment/tennis courts in question, I am ready to offer a definitive answer.

For the purposes of giving directions, "before the tennis courts" is correct. From another perspective, one could also say "behind the tennis courts" but it would be less clear for giving directions in this case.
posted by amethysts at 3:07 PM on August 30, 2008


« Older So i'm frugal, but what's next ?   |   Color Crazy Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.