What's the best way to pace yourself when reading?
September 11, 2007 4:46 PM Subscribe
What's the best way to pace yourself when reading?
I recently realized that I have two different styles of reading with regard to pacing. One: I move along rather rapdily, breezing through the pages. Two: I savor every word and every sentence.
What is the best way to read: fast or slow? When I read fast, I am happy to have a story unfold for me before my eyes. But when I read slow, I take joy in lingering on the words and images, savoring every sentence.
Have you found a good way of balancing the tendency to read fast and slow, so that you both get to enjoy a book's details and yet not have to literally absorb every word and image at the speed of a snail crawling?
I recently realized that I have two different styles of reading with regard to pacing. One: I move along rather rapdily, breezing through the pages. Two: I savor every word and every sentence.
What is the best way to read: fast or slow? When I read fast, I am happy to have a story unfold for me before my eyes. But when I read slow, I take joy in lingering on the words and images, savoring every sentence.
Have you found a good way of balancing the tendency to read fast and slow, so that you both get to enjoy a book's details and yet not have to literally absorb every word and image at the speed of a snail crawling?
For work, I "savor" every word, if it can be called that. I can't mess up on what is written on the page.
For fun, I go as my heart leads me, which means: very goddamn fast.
posted by Ironmouth at 5:15 PM on September 11, 2007
For fun, I go as my heart leads me, which means: very goddamn fast.
posted by Ironmouth at 5:15 PM on September 11, 2007
it totally depends. usually, you will read at the pace you should read at--a plot-heavy text lends itself to fast reading and lots of rapid page-turning, while a more literary text will make you slow down. i wouldn't worry.
posted by thinkingwoman at 6:35 PM on September 11, 2007
posted by thinkingwoman at 6:35 PM on September 11, 2007
I read fiction pretty fast. In books with a lot of characters, I make a quick stop and focus on the character's name during a given sentence so that I don't lose track of who is doing what, etc.
When I read textbooks, I do the same thing, except I do it on the subject of the sentence. (I also skim first, very quickly before reading a section or a long paragraph).
posted by i_am_a_Jedi at 7:15 PM on September 11, 2007
When I read textbooks, I do the same thing, except I do it on the subject of the sentence. (I also skim first, very quickly before reading a section or a long paragraph).
posted by i_am_a_Jedi at 7:15 PM on September 11, 2007
When I read fiction for just pleasure, I just read. Non-fiction or a book that I don't own, I mark interesting passages with post-its and return to them later. Textbooks and complicated reading I usually annotate in the Adler style a la Great Books. It really helps for law, science papers, etc. even if it is a little time consuming.
posted by melissam at 8:20 PM on September 11, 2007
posted by melissam at 8:20 PM on September 11, 2007
Definitely depends on the material. I usually devour books (I'm up to 40-some novels this year so far) but if it's really standout writing, I find I naturally slow down.
For example, I recently read John Fowles' The Magus and, as much as I wanted to speed through it and figure out what was going on, the writing was so compelling I just had to slow down and savor it.
posted by JaredSeth at 8:41 PM on September 11, 2007
For example, I recently read John Fowles' The Magus and, as much as I wanted to speed through it and figure out what was going on, the writing was so compelling I just had to slow down and savor it.
posted by JaredSeth at 8:41 PM on September 11, 2007
I've been wondering the same thing about my own reading habits, OP.
It's like a buffet of your favorite foods: devour to your heart's content, or really enjoy each bite?
For fiction, I really like to go slow and enjoy the scenery. My trouble is, if I read slowly I invariably fall asleep, which I've seen others discuss on AskMeFi (not the reading slowly part, but the falling asleep part). But rushing it seems such a waste!
I do like Orb's idea though, of reading first quickly, then going back and smelling the roses. That's a good way to watch films too, BTW.
posted by Rykey at 8:58 PM on September 11, 2007
It's like a buffet of your favorite foods: devour to your heart's content, or really enjoy each bite?
For fiction, I really like to go slow and enjoy the scenery. My trouble is, if I read slowly I invariably fall asleep, which I've seen others discuss on AskMeFi (not the reading slowly part, but the falling asleep part). But rushing it seems such a waste!
I do like Orb's idea though, of reading first quickly, then going back and smelling the roses. That's a good way to watch films too, BTW.
posted by Rykey at 8:58 PM on September 11, 2007
Didn't we do this before? Oh yes, here.
I don't think there is one universal good speed for reading, do whatever feels best to you at the time. I guess you could check yourself, hold back, take a few pauses, think about what you're reading, if you feel you're going too fast but otherwise, there are no rules.
posted by shelleycat at 11:40 PM on September 11, 2007
I don't think there is one universal good speed for reading, do whatever feels best to you at the time. I guess you could check yourself, hold back, take a few pauses, think about what you're reading, if you feel you're going too fast but otherwise, there are no rules.
posted by shelleycat at 11:40 PM on September 11, 2007
This thread is closed to new comments.
The only books I tend to read really slowly on a first reading, other than textbooks or other non-fiction skill-teaching books I am studying from, are the ones that suck, and I usually never even finish reading them one time through let alone twice. Unlike The World Famous, I don't force myself to plod through a poorly written tome. Too many good books out there waiting to be read.
posted by Orb at 5:10 PM on September 11, 2007 [1 favorite]