Arisotcracy with a sense of humor quote?
March 15, 2004 5:36 PM   Subscribe

There's a quote I can't remember. I think it's from E.M. Forster, but I'm not sure. It's something about an "aristocracy" of people with a sense of humor -- a subset of society that is elite, only by virtue of knowing what's up, and having a humorous perspective on things. Ring any bells?
posted by inksyndicate to Writing & Language (4 answers total)
 
I love Forster. Could this be it?

I believe in aristocracy, though - if that is the right word, and if a democrat may use it. Not an aristocracy of power, based upon rank and influence, but an aristocracy of the sensitive, the considerate and the plucky. Its members are to be found in all nations and classes, and all through the ages, and there is a secret understanding between them when they meet. They represent the true human tradition, the one permanent victory of our queer race over cruelty and chaos. Thousands of them perish in obscurity, a few are great names. They are sensitive for others as well as for themselves, they are considerate without being fussy, their pluck is not swankiness but the power to endure, and they can take a joke. I give no examples - it is risky to do that - but the reader may as well consider whether this is the type of person he would like to meet and to be, and whether (going further with me) he would prefer that this type should not be an ascetic one. I am against asceticism myself. I am with the old Scotsman who wanted less chastity and more delicacy. I do not feel that my aristocrats are a real aristocracy if they thwart their bodies, since bodies are the instruments through which we register and enjoy the world. Still, I do not insist. This is not a major point. It is clearly possible to be sensitive, considerate and plucky and yet be an ascetic too, and if anyone possesses the first three qualities I will let him in! On they go - an invincible army, yet not a victorious one. The aristocrats, the elect, the chosen, the Best People - all the words that describe them are false, and all attempts to organize them fail. Again and again Authority, seeing their value, has tried to net them and to utilize them as the Egyptian Priesthood or the Christian Church or the Chinese Civil Service or the Group Movement, or some other worthy stunt. But they slip through the net and are gone; when the door is shut, they are no longer in the room; their temple, as one of them remarked, is the holiness of the Heart's affections, and their kingdom, though they never possess it, is the wide-open world.

. . .

And as for individualism - there seems no way of getting off this, even if one wanted to. The dictator-hero can grind down his citizens till they are all alike, but he cannot melt them into a single man. That is beyond his power. He can order them to merge, he can incite them to mass-antics, but they are obliged to be born separately, and to die separately, and, owing to these unavoidable termini, will always be running off the totalitarian rails. The memory of birth and the expectation of death always lurk within the human being, making him separate from his fellows and consequently capable of intercourse with them. . . .
posted by onlyconnect at 5:57 PM on March 15, 2004


Sounds like bloggers, to me.
posted by davidmsc at 6:29 PM on March 15, 2004


...knowing what's up, and having a humorous perspective on things.

Forster or no, most of the time that's about all you can do.
posted by Shane at 6:37 PM on March 15, 2004


Thanks!
posted by inksyndicate at 9:30 PM on March 15, 2004


« Older Windows XP crashes sometimes when I enable "Show...   |   Whiny Power Supply Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.