Three additional blasphemous cartoon source?
February 6, 2006 11:53 AM   Subscribe

Linkage to the additional three non-Danish blasphemous cartoons?

First, to summarize askMe queries so far, there's been three. The original request for the images, another, similar request which includes dhartung's statement that a link to the additional three is available, and the latest, about pinpointing when the rioting began. Also, in the blue, Depictions of Mohammed Throughout History concerns a lengthy, image-intensive page, the very one upon which dhartung alleges that a link is available to a Danish source of the three additional images. Can you find it?

About those three cartoons. According to The Guardian,

the imams ... took three other mysteriously unsourced drawings as well, showing Muhammad with the face of a pig; a dog sodomising a praying Muslim; and Muhammad as a paedophile.


Wikipedia sources a WSJ editorial, says it
alleges that the controversy was fueled by Danish Muslims who added three non-published images to the cartoons. (The images were: one involved a pig's nose on his face, another stating him to be a paedophile, and the third showing an indecent act with a dog).


So where are these additional three?
posted by Rash to Media & Arts (5 answers total)
 
The booklet of cartoons presented by the Danish muslims used to be here (link to Danish tabloid 'Ekstra Bladet'), but all the links now appear to be dead.

Incessant googling has so far proven resultless.
posted by AwkwardPause at 12:11 PM on February 6, 2006


They are on this page.

The guy has a right wing agenda, but the non-published drawings are there. As well as a lot of other historical depictions of mohhamed.

That was linked from instapundit yesterday.
posted by empath at 12:21 PM on February 6, 2006


This blog post has thumbnails of the three "extras", and links to larger versions.
posted by reynaert at 12:25 PM on February 6, 2006


Best answer: Rash, I'm sorry you couldn't find them. The text on the page seems to have changed and the word "furthermore" no longer exists. Right now, "Yet when" works, though. Here's another source.

The images have circulated by SMS for weeks now, too, further divorcing them from the original context. It's likely that there are images circulating that have nothing to do with the original Danish publication, but inflame emotions anyway.

I'm really pissed at these clowns for putting me on the same side as Michelle Malkin and Charles Johnson -- they're "our" imams. In other words, they have the same agenda: inflame hatred. (The timing -- just as hearings into the NSA issue begin -- is quite convenient.)
posted by dhartung at 9:43 PM on February 6, 2006


Is this for real? Those three cartoons don't look anything like the cartoons that were printed in the Danish newspaper. Is there any definitive proof that they were actually distributed by imams? Because a bunch of right-wing reactionary bloggers aren't going to convince me.
posted by croutonsupafreak at 9:59 PM on February 6, 2006


« Older I Want Candy! (for my new iMac)   |   shoe fix in nyc Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.