Help me pick an appropriate level of first aid training
July 19, 2015 1:22 PM Subscribe
For general life preparedness and education, I'd like to take a course for First Aid, First Responder (FR), or Emergency Medical Responder (EMR), but I'm finding it hard to decide. I'm leaning towards FR or EMR because I think this field is interesting and want to learn more, and because I have time to invest in it. However, FR and EMR have additional requirements which sound potentially onerous for someone who doesn't actively practice in the field. I'm in Vancouver, BC.
My only past experience with this area is getting certified in Basic First Aid back in high school, which has long since expired. I don't go into the wilderness, and I have an office job.
I see that FR/EMR requires provincial licencing, and in the case of EMR, yearly continuing competence requirements. Is this as big of a deal as I think it is? Should I just take something like Occupational First Aid (OFA) Level 3?
My research so far is mainly on the websites of JIBC and St. John's Ambulance. I've ruled out the paramedic courses, as they appear to be geared towards those who intend to make it a career.
I'd appreciate any insights that'd help me make a decision here.
My only past experience with this area is getting certified in Basic First Aid back in high school, which has long since expired. I don't go into the wilderness, and I have an office job.
I see that FR/EMR requires provincial licencing, and in the case of EMR, yearly continuing competence requirements. Is this as big of a deal as I think it is? Should I just take something like Occupational First Aid (OFA) Level 3?
My research so far is mainly on the websites of JIBC and St. John's Ambulance. I've ruled out the paramedic courses, as they appear to be geared towards those who intend to make it a career.
I'd appreciate any insights that'd help me make a decision here.
Of the options you've laid out, it looks like the First Responder is the best choice for you. You'll learn "life-saving skills and knowledge to perform patient care to the public until the arrival of the ambulance", which will allow you to provide care in emergency non-wilderness situations.
I also think the Wilderness First Responder course is very much worth considering, even if you don't spend time in the wilderness. WFR assumes a wilderness context; instead of teaching you what to do in the first few minutes of emergency care, it teaches you what to do in the first few hours and how to think about your evacuation options. On the medical skill side, this means you learn about a much larger range of problems, from bee stings to broken bones. You don't go into as much detail as EMR, but you'll go much further than FR in ways that will be useful to your everyday life. You'll understand how to deal with low-level injuries and medical issues, when to call a doctor, and when something is a real emergency. While you will learn some skills that you will not practice outside of a wilderness context, you will also learn a lot of very useful medical information.
In terms of general-life preparedness, WFR is also very good at helping you think about priorities, decision-making, logistics, and leadership. A FR course will develop some of these skills, but again it's focused on "X minutes until the ambulance" rather than the longer time period and complicated range of factors involved in the wilderness context. The practical sessions in FR will provide some of this, but WFR will give you some of the best in-depth, realistic emergency training you can get without becoming a medical professional.
posted by earth by april at 5:23 PM on July 19, 2015
I also think the Wilderness First Responder course is very much worth considering, even if you don't spend time in the wilderness. WFR assumes a wilderness context; instead of teaching you what to do in the first few minutes of emergency care, it teaches you what to do in the first few hours and how to think about your evacuation options. On the medical skill side, this means you learn about a much larger range of problems, from bee stings to broken bones. You don't go into as much detail as EMR, but you'll go much further than FR in ways that will be useful to your everyday life. You'll understand how to deal with low-level injuries and medical issues, when to call a doctor, and when something is a real emergency. While you will learn some skills that you will not practice outside of a wilderness context, you will also learn a lot of very useful medical information.
In terms of general-life preparedness, WFR is also very good at helping you think about priorities, decision-making, logistics, and leadership. A FR course will develop some of these skills, but again it's focused on "X minutes until the ambulance" rather than the longer time period and complicated range of factors involved in the wilderness context. The practical sessions in FR will provide some of this, but WFR will give you some of the best in-depth, realistic emergency training you can get without becoming a medical professional.
posted by earth by april at 5:23 PM on July 19, 2015
Perhaps you can look at the Vancouver City volunteer corps? After the basic training you can take courses for neighborhood emergency response which would cover first aid as well as preparedness/disaster management for earthquakes etc.
posted by boffin police at 5:35 PM on July 19, 2015
posted by boffin police at 5:35 PM on July 19, 2015
You should consider volunteering with St John Ambulance! We provide free first aid training to volunteers, and then provide first aid at community events almost every weekend. You'll get lots of experience with patients, mostly treating small injuries, but also occasionally major trauma. There are 3 very active Vancouver divisions.
Check your mefi mail.
posted by piper4 at 5:44 PM on July 19, 2015
Check your mefi mail.
posted by piper4 at 5:44 PM on July 19, 2015
Response by poster: I've heard good things about the wilderness-level courses, but it hasn't been my first choice due to inconvenience, because it seems to only be available in North Vancouver, and I don't drive. How does WFR compare against EMR?
As for volunteering with St. John Ambulance, it's definitely an option, but I don't know if I'm ready to dive into uniformed volunteer service. It seems intimidating.
boffin police: Unfortunately, I'm not in the City of Vancouver proper - just nearby.
posted by spreadsheetzu at 7:06 PM on July 19, 2015
As for volunteering with St. John Ambulance, it's definitely an option, but I don't know if I'm ready to dive into uniformed volunteer service. It seems intimidating.
boffin police: Unfortunately, I'm not in the City of Vancouver proper - just nearby.
posted by spreadsheetzu at 7:06 PM on July 19, 2015
Do consider how much time and money keeping the certification will cost. For example, while I think WFR is a great class to keep that certification you need to take a weekend course and spend x money every few years. If the certification lapses it will cost around $900 and 9 days to get the certification again. I think it is overkill unless you are working outdoors. (previously had EMT and WFR certifications).
posted by fieldtrip at 7:17 PM on July 19, 2015
posted by fieldtrip at 7:17 PM on July 19, 2015
Check with your workplace to see if they have designated "First Responders" and ask if you can be on the list for the next training. Then your job will pay for it!
posted by WeekendJen at 10:00 AM on July 21, 2015
posted by WeekendJen at 10:00 AM on July 21, 2015
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by Northbysomewhatcrazy at 3:15 PM on July 19, 2015 [1 favorite]