<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with wiretap</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/wiretap</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'wiretap' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:50:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:50:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Is it actually illegal to record conversations in MA?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/132488/Is%2Dit%2Dactually%2Dillegal%2Dto%2Drecord%2Dconversations%2Din%2DMA</link>	
	<description>Does the requirement for two-party consent to record conversations in Massachusetts (and other states) really mean that I can&apos;t legally record any audio from public places without getting the consent of everybody who can be heard on the recording? Massachusetts is a &quot;two-party consent&quot; state which means &quot;it is a crime to record any conversation, whether oral or wire, without the consent of all parties&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rcfp.org/taping/states/massachusetts.html&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;)  Does this mean that, technically, I can&apos;t do things like video/audio record a family party unless all parties consent to it?  Is there an exception for conversations that occur in a public place?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/272-99.htm&quot;&gt;The law&lt;/a&gt; doesn&apos;t mention any exceptions, but it seems to be awfully overbearing without some &quot;common sense&quot; exceptions.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And yes, I know YANML, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/news/x1467270710/Police-say-irate-car-dealership-customer-recorded-altercation&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; brought the issue to my attention.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks!</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.132488</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:50:30 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>laws</category>
	<category>massachusetts</category>
	<category>recording</category>
	<category>wiretap</category>
	<dc:creator>um_maverick</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>why?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/94971/why</link>	
	<description>Why are the Democrats &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/72648/Telecom-Amnesty-Bill-Tomorrow&quot;&gt;granting&lt;/a&gt; the telcoms &lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/08/06/19/1931226.shtml&quot;&gt;immunity&lt;/a&gt; from civil lawsuits in the new FISA bill?  What is their angle?

Sure, if the yokels understood telcom immunity, one can sell this as &quot;defending America&quot;, without giving Cheney&apos;s palls another few billion dollars.  But do the yokels care?  Isn&apos;t anyone who cares a safe vote?  So doesn&apos;t this move alienates &amp;amp; discourages the Democrat&apos;s base.  Is it just about telcom campaign contributions for the upcoming election?  Or are the more specific strategical reasons?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.94971</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:17:05 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>FISA</category>
	<category>politics</category>
	<category>wiretap</category>
	<dc:creator>jeffburdges</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Fired by voicemail</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59294/Fired%2Dby%2Dvoicemail</link>	
	<description>I got fired via voicemail.  Am I allowed to publish this voicemail to the web? Some background:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I started working as a waiter at a restaurant about 9 months ago.  When I was hired, a friend of mine mentioned that somebody that I was acquainted with used to be a manager there.  I was acquainted with this person because he was a regular at an establishment that I had previously worked at.  Four months into working there, my boss fired the two bartenders because they started a side business that he felt conflicted with his own.  I was promoted to head bartender.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My boss is very vindictive, occassionally making comments to me to the affect, &quot;When you see the old bartender thank him for your job,&quot; and other comments.  I remained friends with the old bartender and consider him to be a good friend of mine, so I was very put off by the comments.  I never mentioned the former bartender because whenever the subject came up it put my boss in a foul mood and my work environment suffered because of it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Wednesday of last week as him and I were closing the restaurant down for the night we were having a very informal chat.  My boss was going on vacation to Argentina (where he&apos;s from) and was going over the things that I would have to do to pick up the slack during his absence (liquor/wine ordering, etc.) followed by us both talking about our personal lives.  I made a comment that I heard that bad things have happened before he has left in the past.  He looked at me puzzled and I explained to him that I heard he fired the former manager right before he left last time he went to Argentina.  He asked me how I knew him, I told him he was a regular at my last job.  He told me I was lying to him and f#*&amp;amp;ing with him.  He told me I only know him because I met him through the former bartender (wholly untrue, never saw the two together in my life).  I told him I wasn&apos;t, why would I do that?  Calmed him down as best I could, but I had to go.  Went out after work, had my cell phone charging at home so it wasn&apos;t on my person.  When I came home I had a voicemail from the owner.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It turns out that the former manager is the chef for the former bartender&apos;s side business.  I didn&apos;t know this, if I did I would never have mentioned his name to my boss.  I&apos;m friends with the old bartender, but I am not privy to much information about his business, nor do I inquire.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have to file a labor board claim against him for: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1. Failure to pay overtime.&lt;br&gt;
2. Working off the clock.&lt;br&gt;
3. Wrongfully scheduling breaks (Come into work, forced to take a lunch break 1/2 hour later, then working for 8 hours straight.)&lt;br&gt;
4. Not giving me my final check.&lt;br&gt;
5. When finally getting my final check it was shorted ~12 hours.&lt;br&gt;
6. Possibly wrongful termination.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve tried to talk to my former employer but all attempts have failed, the last communication was the voicemail, except for the next day when I came in to get my final check he had an &quot;important table, and I should understand&quot;.  I waited over an hour and finally gave up on getting paid or talking to him.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I want to publish this voicemail on the web, the friends that I&apos;ve played it for have all been astounded.  He chuckles and refers to me being fired as &quot;good news&quot;.  I&apos;ve saved it as an mp3 and edited a person&apos;s last name and the name of the establishment out of it (I don&apos;t want to give him business, any publicity is good publicity as they say).  Can I legally do this?  Even if I can legally do this, could this hamper my case with the labor board (I do not plan to sue him in a court, just use the administrative process).  I&apos;m in California if that makes a difference.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59294</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:23:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>batshitinsane</category>
	<category>bugging</category>
	<category>fired</category>
	<category>libel</category>
	<category>privacy</category>
	<category>slander</category>
	<category>wiretap</category>
	<dc:creator>Mijo Bijo</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Response to: &quot;If you&apos;ve done nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about&quot;</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/39312/Response%2Dto%2DIf%2Dyouve%2Ddone%2Dnothing%2Dwrong%2Dyou%2Dhave%2Dnothing%2Dto%2Dworry%2Dabout</link>	
	<description>I&apos;m getting pretty tired of hearing the line &quot;if you&apos;ve done nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about&quot; in regards to what&apos;s happening right now in Washington.  I&apos;ve heard some long articulate responses to this, but what&apos;s a good one or two sentence response that succinctly points out the error in this line of thinking?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.39312</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:18:47 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>bush</category>
	<category>cia</category>
	<category>nsa</category>
	<category>wiretap</category>
	<dc:creator>WetherMan</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>In OS X, how can I capture sound from a QuickTime video in my browser window?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8397/In%2DOS%2DX%2Dhow%2Dcan%2DI%2Dcapture%2Dsound%2Dfrom%2Da%2DQuickTime%2Dvideo%2Din%2Dmy%2Dbrowser%2Dwindow</link>	
	<description>In OS X, how can I capture sound from a QuickTime video in my browser window? I can&apos;t save the video to disk.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8397</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:23:34 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>audiohijack</category>
	<category>Mac</category>
	<category>OSX</category>
	<category>video</category>
	<category>wiretap</category>
	<dc:creator>kirkaracha</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

