<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with waybackmachine</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/waybackmachine</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'waybackmachine' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:25:24 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:25:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Why doesn&apos;t the Wayback Machine give current results?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/63091/Why%2Ddoesnt%2Dthe%2DWayback%2DMachine%2Dgive%2Dcurrent%2Dresults</link>	
	<description>Why don&apos;t I see any 2007 snapshot pages on a Wayback Machine search I am looking for snapshots of http://www.kgw.com for the past couple of months.  The Wayback Machine only shows archived pages up until April of 2006.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If I put http://www.archive.org into Wayback, it only shows results through 2001!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I understand that websites can be excluded via modifying the robots.txt file.  Is there any other possibility?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyone know what gives?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.63091</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:25:24 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>archive</category>
	<category>waybackmachine</category>
	<dc:creator>Roach</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>&quot;Missing&quot; Pitchfork review</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38734/Missing%2DPitchfork%2Dreview</link>	
	<description>Where can I get a copy of Pitchfork Media&apos;s original review of &quot;In the Aeroplane Over the Sea&quot; by Neutral Milk Hotel? When the album was reissued in the UK, Pitchfork took the opportunity to rewrite their review, giving it their top score of 10.0.  The original review was somewhere in the 7-9 range, I believe.  This original page is also newly missing from the Wayback Machine (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-collective.net/~sashwap/index.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; where there is now a broken Wayback link, although many other of their pages remain in the archive).  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Did anyone print it out?  Did anyone copy and paste it into their blog?  Does anyone have any ideas for finding it?  Is this just one of the interesting/sad effects of digital media?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.38734</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 11:50:36 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>album</category>
	<category>archive</category>
	<category>missing</category>
	<category>neutralmilkhotel</category>
	<category>nmh</category>
	<category>pitchfork</category>
	<category>pitchforkmedia</category>
	<category>review</category>
	<category>waybackmachine</category>
	<dc:creator>unknowncommand</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

