<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with waterbottles</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/waterbottles</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'waterbottles' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:53:24 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:53:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Are Nalgene water bottles really unsafe?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33382/Are%2DNalgene%2Dwater%2Dbottles%2Dreally%2Dunsafe</link>	
	<description>Are Nalgene water bottles really unsafe? So, a while ago there was a lot of hoopla about Nalgene water bottles with the recycling designation of #7 (a form of lexan, I think) causing all sorts of health problems in lab tests.  However, the only information I can find is third-hand on sites of questionable repute.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
At the time, I stopped using my nice Nalgene bottle, but I am curious if this actually panned out to be more than anything but scaremongering?  Namely, can I start using my Nalgene bottle again without the fear of having my testicles shrink and die?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33382</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:53:24 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>health</category>
	<category>healthy_and_happy_sperm</category>
	<category>nalgene</category>
	<category>testicles</category>
	<category>waterbottles</category>
	<dc:creator>Loto</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

