<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with warming and climate</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/warming+climate</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'warming' and 'climate' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:48:46 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:48:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Who is leading the fight against coal?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/145045/Who%2Dis%2Dleading%2Dthe%2Dfight%2Dagainst%2Dcoal</link>	
	<description>In his book &lt;em&gt;Storms of My Grandchildren&lt;/em&gt;, James Hansen makes the case that phasing out coal is the most important thing for humanity to do, to reduce the chances of catastrophic climate change. As such, my question is this: which organizations in Canada and the US are doing the most to advance that aim, both domestically and internationally? Note: I am not interested in anyone&apos;s personal views on the nature of climate change, coal, James Hansen, or anything else. Just an answer to the narrow question.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2010:site.145045</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:48:46 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>change</category>
	<category>climate</category>
	<category>climatechange</category>
	<category>coal</category>
	<category>environment</category>
	<category>global</category>
	<category>warming</category>
	<dc:creator>sindark</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Climate change ideology</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/139145/Climate%2Dchange%2Dideology</link>	
	<description>Help me understand the liberal/conservative split in the US with regard to global warming. I&apos;m puzzled as to why anthropogenic climate change became a issue that&apos;s split largely along liberal/conservative lines.   The analogy in my mind is of a liberal/conservative split on whether &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP_problem&quot;&gt;P=NP&lt;/a&gt; or not.  Why has this become an ideological question and not a scientific one?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Remember, kids, I&apos;m only asking a meta-question about global warming, so play nice.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.139145</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:57:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>climate</category>
	<category>ideology</category>
	<category>warming</category>
	<dc:creator>schrodycat</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>What are some good books on the history of Earth&apos;s climate?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/114034/What%2Dare%2Dsome%2Dgood%2Dbooks%2Don%2Dthe%2Dhistory%2Dof%2DEarths%2Dclimate</link>	
	<description>I&apos;m looking into global climate history.  Is there a particularly good overview for this? I&apos;m a layman interested in climate change in the Earth&apos;s history - not just within a human timeframe, but reaching back as far as the term &quot;climate&quot; can reasonably be applied.  &lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m looking for books - although if you know documentaries or websites that deal with this I&apos;d be glad for that info as well - including both those which give a good overview of Earth&apos;s climatic history and those which specialize in specific eras.  Accessibility to someone without a Ph.D. in the field would also be a plus.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.114034</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:14:51 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>change</category>
	<category>climate</category>
	<category>cooling</category>
	<category>global</category>
	<category>history</category>
	<category>warming</category>
	<dc:creator>AdamCSnider</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Fountain pens and climate change, two great tastes that go well together</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76099/Fountain%2Dpens%2Dand%2Dclimate%2Dchange%2Dtwo%2Dgreat%2Dtastes%2Dthat%2Dgo%2Dwell%2Dtogether</link>	
	<description>Why is &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mont_Blanc&quot;&gt;Mont Blanc&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s  height so stable? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montblanc_%28pens%29&quot;&gt;pen&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.montblanc.com/index.php&quot;&gt;company&lt;/a&gt; has been marking 4810 on their nibs since &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fountainpen.de/old-122-sterling-silver.htm&quot;&gt;at least the 1930s&lt;/a&gt;. Just this year, it measured &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/climate-change-making-mont-blanc-even-higher/2007/10/14/1192300600742.html&quot;&gt;4810&lt;/a&gt;m tall.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76099</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>blanc</category>
	<category>climate</category>
	<category>glacier</category>
	<category>global</category>
	<category>globalwarming</category>
	<category>ice</category>
	<category>microclimate</category>
	<category>mont</category>
	<category>montblanc</category>
	<category>mountain</category>
	<category>warming</category>
	<dc:creator>b1tr0t</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Do reasonable global warming arguments exist?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/68957/Do%2Dreasonable%2Dglobal%2Dwarming%2Darguments%2Dexist</link>	
	<description>Do reasonable arguments for or against global warming actually exist for regular people like me to read? Or must I be stuck with the annoying rhetoric of both sides? Critics of global warming claim it is faux-science, yet I never see them give evidence of this claim.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Proponents of global warming say &quot;look at the science&quot; and the evidence pretty much speaks for itself.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My question: Where is the science? What is a good resource to look at this data. Most of the mainstream news and conservative news just spouts snippits and rhetoric. Where can I find some good information on the &quot;science&quot; behind the current global warming warnings. I&apos;ve watched &quot;An Inconvenient Truth&quot; but I shudder when I hear Al Gore strongly suggest we&apos;ll either be underwater or dead in ten years (now down to 8 years).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, for that matter, is there a resource that attempts to rebut the science reasonably? Preferably without that maliciousness and sarcasm of Fox News or Rush Limbaugh?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.68957</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:44:21 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>change</category>
	<category>climate</category>
	<category>global</category>
	<category>globalwarming</category>
	<category>warming</category>
	<dc:creator>donmak</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

