<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with stemcells</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/stemcells</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'stemcells' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:06:49 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:06:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>How do you know if you have a stem cell?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107269/How%2Ddo%2Dyou%2Dknow%2Dif%2Dyou%2Dhave%2Da%2Dstem%2Dcell</link>	
	<description>How do you know if you have a stem cell? I&apos;m reading about scientists turning adult cells into stem cells. How do they know that they have a stem cell?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.107269</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:06:49 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>stemcells</category>
	<dc:creator>mpls2</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Questions about Missouri Amendment 2?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/49436/Questions%2Dabout%2DMissouri%2DAmendment%2D2</link>	
	<description>Missouri Amendment 2: Why an amendment? Why not a statute? (more questions inside) I&apos;ve read the amendment, but all the analysis I&apos;ve read is incredibly biased, I&apos;d like to actually discuss it&apos;s merits and pitfalls with some rational individuals. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sos.mo.gov/elections/2006petitions/ppStemCell.asp&quot;&gt;The full text of the amendment is here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I am pro stem-cell-research but my questions are these:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-Why an amendment? Why not a statute? I&apos;m uncomfortable with writing something so specific into the constitution of the state&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-A big criticism voiced by opponents is that it will give tax-payer money to corporations doing this research. How? I can&apos;t find any direct evidence of this. Unless they mean that research departments that receive federal grants will use that grant money for this research. I think that argument is equally valid against any sort of research, or the NEA for that matter.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I do understand that the amendment does redefine to an extent &quot;cloning&quot; by allowing somatic cell nuclear transfer and beginning of the existence of the clone at implantation in a uterus as opposed to when the DNA is transferred and the cell begins to divide&#8212;that strikes me as somewhat slippery and makes me ask again, why an amendment and not a law, subject to legislative discussion prior to approval. As much as I&apos;m pro-science this amendment angle makes me suspicious of . . . something.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.49436</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:30:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>amendment2</category>
	<category>missouri</category>
	<category>stemcells</category>
	<dc:creator>MarvinTheCat</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>What&apos;s the deal with cord blood and farming your own stem cells?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/15638/Whats%2Dthe%2Ddeal%2Dwith%2Dcord%2Dblood%2Dand%2Dfarming%2Dyour%2Down%2Dstem%2Dcells</link>	
	<description>I&apos;ve been reading up a bit lately on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cordblood.com/popups/catch/pop_reasons.asp&quot;&gt;cord blood&lt;/a&gt;. It&apos;s kind of a cool idea, to capture stem cells your child may need someday -- kinda like always having &quot;spare parts&quot; available if anything goes wrong and technology continues to innovate. But I get the feeling that it costs a grand or so to start, and hundreds per year. I also hear that it may only help in childhood leukemia instances, so I&apos;m on the fence. Is it worth the money? Are the applications for it real and tangible? Is it a smart insurance policy at this point or a silly thing worrisome parents are being bilked over?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.15638</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:07:40 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>baby</category>
	<category>cordblood</category>
	<category>medical</category>
	<category>stemcells</category>
	<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Stem Cell Research</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/11652/Stem%2DCell%2DResearch</link>	
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Stem Cells.&lt;/b&gt; I&apos;m looking for a recent, thorough, non-partisan (read: scientific) book or long article about the subject in general.  I&apos;m more interested in the science than the ethical aspects, but I&apos;d be happy to read about those issues as well.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.11652</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:26:18 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>medicine</category>
	<category>science</category>
	<category>stemcells</category>
	<dc:creator>gwint</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

