<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with staplers</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/staplers</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'staplers' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:54:07 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:54:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>How to join sheets of paper most effectively without staples or tape</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/108148/How%2Dto%2Djoin%2Dsheets%2Dof%2Dpaper%2Dmost%2Deffectively%2Dwithout%2Dstaples%2Dor%2Dtape</link>	
	<description>Can anyone help me save the planet one staple at a time? I sell a lot of stamps online, and in trying to reduce the footprint of this exercise (by using clean backs of paper printed on one side, recycled paperboard, etc.) I&apos;ve been looking for a replacement to tape or staplers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yes, I know about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/tools/8b70/?cpg=ab&quot;&gt;Staple-Free Stapler&lt;/a&gt; that, for instance, ThinkGeek sells, and that was previous discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/78444/Green-office-products-that-arent-in-bulk&quot;&gt;here on ask.metafilter&lt;/a&gt;, but as far as I know it only works on the corners of paper, and its limitation of four-five pages might be overly restrictive.  My ideal one, if it exists, would be more traditionally stapler-shaped: be able to reach in and attach as far as the neck would allow.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000V6BMFU/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;An amazon partner has one that looks like it might work&lt;/a&gt;, but the reviews are not very detailed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don&apos;t know what the technology would be: weaving, crimping, or something more clever I haven&apos;t thought of.  But I&apos;m handing it over to you.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.108148</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:54:07 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>ecology</category>
	<category>greenproducts</category>
	<category>inventions</category>
	<category>officesupplies</category>
	<category>staplers</category>
	<dc:creator>quarantine</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>why do all staplers suck?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/25417/why%2Ddo%2Dall%2Dstaplers%2Dsuck</link>	
	<description>Where have all the good staplers gone? Every stapler we&apos;ve purchased at work has been crap. Swinglines, swingline electric, Stanley Bostitch heavy duty.  They all end up jamming, breaking, or getting ripped off by students (different problem).  I&apos;m looking for a reliable stapler, something heavy enough to have served as a murder weapon in an episode of Perry Mason.  My sense is that they&apos;ve just gotten cheaper over the years as an expression of some sort of evil planned obsolescence.  No Office Space references allowed in this thread, please.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.25417</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:12:34 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>globalization</category>
	<category>staplers</category>
	<dc:creator>craniac</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

