<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with stakes</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/stakes</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'stakes' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:50:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:50:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Academic politics are vicious because the stakes are so low?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/80812/Academic%2Dpolitics%2Dare%2Dvicious%2Dbecause%2Dthe%2Dstakes%2Dare%2Dso%2Dlow</link>	
	<description>Does anyone have a decent citation for the idea that academic politics are so cruel/brutal/intense/vicious because the stakes are so low? I&apos;ve seen various attributions to Wallace Sayre, Henry Kissinger, Woodrow Wilson, and Harry Truman, but I&apos;d like a source that isn&apos;t a weak tie via Google, something like a reputable book of quotations or an edition of letters, if possible.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.80812</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>academic</category>
	<category>politics</category>
	<category>stakes</category>
	<category>vicious</category>
	<dc:creator>cgc373</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

